Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Jun 2013 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
OSNews, Generic OSes A new release of the hobby operating system MenuetOS! The release notes are a bit non-descript, but you'll have to take what you can get: "updates and improvements (picview, httpc, ehci, ...)".
Thread beginning with comment 565231
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by drcouzelis
by Kochise on Fri 21st Jun 2013 10:37 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by drcouzelis"
Kochise
Member since:
2006-03-03

Watch it till the end. It makes some sense at the end.

Sad they not incorporate some clues about Darwinian evolution (fish to lizards to dinosaurs to birds, the mammal tree with humans on its branch)

But still, there is some sense.

Kochise

Edited 2013-06-21 10:39 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: Comment by drcouzelis
by Laurence on Fri 21st Jun 2013 11:49 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by drcouzelis"
Laurence Member since:
2007-03-26

The idea of church being an organisation bent on control is a pretty well established one. It's one of the reasons I dislike organised religions.

And most of the symmetry they demonstrated could easily be explained by coincidence (after all, there's also a great deal of great wonders that fall outside the described pattern).

The stories about inter-dimensional beings was more the stuff that had me curious. I've often said that if a God-like deity existed, it would have to live outside our 3.1* dimensional plane to fit what we would describe as omnipotent. However the problem with stories like these is they're based almost entirely on speculation.

(*3 dimensions + time)

I also don't like stories that tie psychic phenomena into 3 dimensional beings. Almost always, what people perceive as psychic behaviours are either:

1) retrospective interpretation (eg selective memories such as "I thought something felt odd" when they experience that feeling often but only remember the occasions that links into an event, and how Nostradamus's predictions are re-interpreted post-event to match up with historic events, but never interpreted "correctly" pre-event)

2) subtle subconscious non-psychic readings (eg crossed arms and angry eyes == not happy)

3) "psychosomatic" (ie if you want to believe something badly enough, then you'll feel non-existent connections and notice things that don't exist. A lot like how placebo drugs can fool the patient into believing they have all manor of side-effects.

4) blind luck / coincidence (people are sometimes so keen to believe in a higher power -be that a deity or other supernatural powers- that they'll say the phrase "it's too much of a coincidence not to be xyz" - when in actual fact, coincidences happen all the time)


All that aside, this is one of the less wacky "theories" that I've heard. And certainly interesting enough to make me keen to investigate it further.

Edited 2013-06-21 11:52 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[6]: Comment by drcouzelis
by Kochise on Fri 21st Jun 2013 15:00 in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by drcouzelis"
Kochise Member since:
2006-03-03

Perhaps there is also the lack of knowledge of these 'upper' dimensions that puts the emphasis into wording them correctly.

So, it's perhaps a 'naive' approach that might lead to some sort of hard understandability. Just like trying to understand the 4th dimension through the visualization of an hypercube :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MN4KC_zlW4g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzL091mZQ-E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x4P65EKjt0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOuXtONDAN0

It's hard to figure out without proper way to interact. It's like asking a one eyed to figure out about 3D.

BTW, your Nostradamus stuff, much like the words put into Jesus' mouth (parables) that can also be interpreted the way we want without Him being able to correct us, kinda "No ways dudes, that's NOT what I meant and intended to say !"

People were killed in the name of God, while on the Ten Commands : "thou shall not kill" was specifically told by God himself (if we still believe this crap/mythology). It's just a matter of self perception and interpretation in the way the most favorable to the one standing this cause.

Kochise

Edited 2013-06-21 15:18 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2