Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 28th Jun 2013 14:37 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless "BlackBerry offered few signs of a long-promised turnaround on Friday, with an unexpected quarterly operating loss, a dearth of details on sales of its make-or-break new line of devices and no return to profit expected in the current quarter. BlackBerry shares tumbled about 28 percent in both U.S. and Toronto trading." 'Unexpected'? Really?
Thread beginning with comment 565919
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

I agree as a whole for Visual Studio. The downside of these fast paced yearly updates is just how much Visual Studio costs, and the startling realization that VS doesn't offer upgrade pricing.

I think the solution to this is simple and I'm surprised there's not much movement in this area: We need Visual Studio 365.

Give me a subscription based (and cloud enabled) Visual Studio IDE. That way I can keep up with the fast pace of innovation in a financially sensible manner, Microsoft gets recurring income, and it moves them closer to their Device&Services goal.

I did think the VS2013 stuff was mindblowing though, specifically for XAML devs.

Reply Parent Score: 2

moondevil Member since:

I want my developer tools on my desktop, I will never buy into SaaS tooling.

Reply Parent Score: 4

Nelson Member since:

Well, it depends how the service would work. If they structure it like a cheaper alternative to an MSDN subscription, then it is still is a subscription based service with actual ownership.

There needs to be a solution given the rapid release cycle they've shifted into or people will be paying through the nose for Visual Studio.

I'm personally not opposed to paying a yearly fee to ensure I don't have to drop hundreds of dollars a year.

Reply Parent Score: 3

jared_wilkes Member since:

I'll never trust a developer moaning about the cost of an IDE. If you aren't capable enough as a developer and as a business person to be able to afford relatively cheap software (even if it is on an annual basis), I have no reason to believe you are capable of producing quality software.

Reply Parent Score: 0

moondevil Member since:

Given that Visual Studio licenses cost between $700 and $12 000, unless you are a Microsoft partner, then I think it is only fair for developers to complain if they are now expected to buy a new version per year.

Reply Parent Score: 3