Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 1st Jul 2013 22:02 UTC
Google "In June of 2013, I made an interesting discovery about the Android phone (a Motorola Droid X2) which I was using at the time: it was silently sending a considerable amount of sensitive information to Motorola, and to compound the problem, a great deal of it was over an unencrypted HTTP channel."
Thread beginning with comment 566028
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: duh
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Tue 2nd Jul 2013 17:36 UTC in reply to "RE: duh"
Bill Shooter of Bul
Member since:

I read that late at night, but I don't think that disclaimer was there.

I also don't know how accurate it is to say that it doesn't have blur. Its true there is no blur sign on, but motorola at that time was just phasing out the ui. They still had hopes for using it for marshaling background updates and other data for their use.

IMHO, its bad, but you'd have to have been pretty oblivious ( which is probably 99.99 % of people) to what blur was to think it was working otherwise.

The situation reminds me of stupid options I've had to put in software by customer demand that will knowingly cause problems for them, labeled "WARNING THIS OPTION WILL EAT YOUR CHILDREN", then getting complaints from customers that "IT ATE MY CHILDREN!!!".

Reply Parent Score: 4