To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Sure, as a user I would use the one that feed my needs, if TaksJugger is better than planner the I'll prolly useit, but I don't use that kind of software, I'd use it for the same reason I would use GIMP and INKSCAPE over Krita and Karbon14, because both do the work better than the other.
Now if I have to answer that from the developer point of view, I can tell you that Qt is hands down a better toolkit but I don't have money to pay for a license and I don't wan't to GPL my code, so I prolly go with pyGTK despite of its inperfections it simple feed my economic needs, you may argu that in the long run Qt can be more cheaper but Im on the risk of not being succefull and Qt won't allow me to make my software as a shareware.
Now, why is windows software with of its flaws more succefull, they simple feed the needs of the people, it doesn't have to be the best, it just have to get the work you need done, and GNOME does that, but I don't get apassionated with it, if KDE 4 were going to be a piece of art I'll prolly use it only as a user, as a developer never, Im don't have any religious commitments with GPL, im just realistic.




Member since:
Mitarai, could you please comment on this reply of mine. It was directly targeted to you and you owe me an answer.
http://www.osnews.com/permalink.php?news_id=12551&comment_id=56634