Linked by David Adams on Sun 14th Jul 2013 17:49 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless A perennial question that revolves around Nokia is: why didn't it choose to go with Android to replace Symbian when it decided to kill that as its smartphone operating system in late 2010?
Thread beginning with comment 567108
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

The Nokia board did not really exert control over what Elop did. And no, they did not consider Android, because they feared that Nokia would lose control over its destiny.

It can be read in a highly interesting interview with industry expert Jean-Louis Gassée from last year.

Reply Parent Score: 4

Nelson Member since:

The board of a company did not exert control over Elop did? Says who? You? Certainly not that article.

That article says nothing about the company's decision to go with Windows Phone. Only some theoretical and dubious Osborn effect.

Reply Parent Score: 3

chithanh Member since:

The article says that they did not consider Android.

Only some theoretical and dubious Osborn effect.

Si tacuisses, philosophus mansisses.

Reply Parent Score: 2