Linked by David Adams on Sun 14th Jul 2013 17:49 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless A perennial question that revolves around Nokia is: why didn't it choose to go with Android to replace Symbian when it decided to kill that as its smartphone operating system in late 2010?
Thread beginning with comment 567219
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

Symbian sales can be collapsing relative to where they should be, especially if they lag behind the market so significantly. Given the size of Nokia at the time, it exacerbated the problem.

Now you're just equivocating. You didn't check all your own arguments were accurate before presenting them, and your sloppiness gave ideological opponents an ideal excuse to dismiss your entire post - including the valid parts - on that one technical error alone.

I think its a nit pick at worst, but sure, you're right.

As you may have noticed, you are a bit of a WinPhone fanboy and the audience round here isn't exactly sympathetic to either one.

Confess your 'mea culpa', restate the argument correctly, and remember in future to check your homework fully before you hand it in. :p

Reply Parent Score: 3