Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 17th Jul 2013 17:08 UTC
Apple "All three major Russian cellcos have stopped selling the iPhone, the most dramatic instance so far in a rising tide of operator backlash against Apple's tough contractual requirements. VimpelCom has severed its ties with the handset provider, following in the footsteps of MTS and MegaFon. VimpelCom says it has put Samsung at the top of its list of smartphones to promote under its BeeLine brand. According to PhoneArena, VimpelCom blamed 'draconian contracts' and 'harsh conditions [...] especially in the marketing department' for its decision to dump the iPhone and sign a new deal with Samsung." Apple's treatment of carriers has long been a sore point, however, carriers didn't have much choice. Now that the iPhone is by far no longer the only big money maker, carriers have more leverage.
Thread beginning with comment 567313
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Marketing...
by BushLin on Wed 17th Jul 2013 22:43 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Marketing..."
Member since:

Oh... I get it, you're assuming I'm a Apple drone defending their corporate lock-ins and I'm pinning these events on illegal activity by Samsung.

Well, I'm not. You'll find I bash them just as much as anyone for unethical practices.

I just commented on someone's observation but you came along and made it all about how smart you are. Well, congratulations on your vocabulary but at the end of the day this experience has been no different to encountering a trolling prick. Bye.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[8]: Marketing...
by orfanum on Thu 18th Jul 2013 08:39 in reply to "RE[7]: Marketing..."
orfanum Member since:

I don't care what you call me, whether it's 'Sir' one minute or 'prick' the next.

I am not assuming anything except the assertion you made, and I am calling you out on it.

One of my own last statements was "Evidence, please", which I feel is polite enough.

Blame in on a certain literary style, blame it on assuming I assume you are an Apple fanboi, but I would look closer to home if I were in your shoes, and you know that well enough yourself, or why else indeed stop yourself from going too far without evidence originally.

You don't even have the gumption to say straight what you have implied; all you'd need to do is say something along the lines of "In my view, this can only really point to Samsung's bribing those carriers", you might then earn some respect.

Instead you squirm, you wriggle and you still have neither evidence nor personal credibility.

Congratulations! ;)

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[9]: Marketing...
by BushLin on Thu 18th Jul 2013 10:14 in reply to "RE[8]: Marketing..."
BushLin Member since:

I didn't say bribery, maybe what was offered was just too good terms... I'm open minded.

The reason I run from your interrogation is because I didn't come here for an argument, I came to debate the topic in hand in a reasonable fashion in order to unwind after work... not to defend things I didn't say or frankly don't even care that much about. Technical matters can be absolute, political matters made away from the public are naturally a bit more open for speculation.

You didn't just ask for evidence (although I'm not looking to prove anything) you did at least bring some of your own views on the actual topic finally but if you must insist on me soul searching might I suggest you stop drowning in your own smugness and supposed superiority when, as you say, you don't know me.

Reply Parent Score: 2