Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 22nd Jul 2013 15:21 UTC
Internet & Networking "Every household in Britain connected to the internet will be obliged to declare whether they want to maintain access to online pornography, David Cameron will announce on Monday." And so, the UK nanny state turns to straight up censorship. Let's look at some of the authoritarian policies that David Cameron wishes to enact.
Thread beginning with comment 567736
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: "Children to be protect"
by aligatro on Mon 22nd Jul 2013 18:04 UTC in reply to ""Children to be protect""
aligatro
Member since:
2010-01-28

Another step towards a continent wide firewall.

Soviets would be proud of these little collectivists.


Why would Soviets be proud of this? They were just people like you and me. They never asked for censorship shit, it was done by their government.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: "Children to be protect"
by Savior on Tue 23rd Jul 2013 07:22 in reply to "RE: "Children to be protect""
Savior Member since:
2006-09-02

Why would Soviets be proud of this? They were just people like you and me. They never asked for censorship shit, it was done by their government.


The word "Soviets" usually refers to the government of the Soviet Union, not to the people.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[2]: "Children to be protect"
by zima on Tue 23rd Jul 2013 15:43 in reply to "RE: "Children to be protect""
zima Member since:
2005-07-06

Why would Soviets be proud of this? They were just people like you and me. They never asked for censorship shit, it was done by their government.

Soviets (~"councils"), in union, were the government.

Reply Parent Score: 2