Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 28th Jul 2013 14:06 UTC
General Development "There is a reason I use 'old' languages like J or Lush. It's not a retro affectation; I save that for my suits. These languages are designed better than modern ones. There is some survivor bias here; nobody slings PL/1 or Cobol willingly, but modern language and package designers don't seem to learn much from the masters. Modern code monkeys don't even recognize mastery; mastery is measured in dollars or number of users, which is a poor substitute for distinguishing between what is good and what is dumb. Lady Gaga made more money than Beethoven, but, like, so what?" This isn't just a thing among programmers. The entire industry is obsessed with user numbers, number of applications, and other crap that is meaningless when you consider programming to be art. When I post a new item about some small hobby operating system, the comments will be filled with negativity because it's no Windows or iOS, whereas only ten years ago, we'd have lively discussions about the implementation details. And then people wonder why that scene has died out.
Thread beginning with comment 568190
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Oh goody
by siride on Sun 28th Jul 2013 18:17 UTC in reply to "RE: Oh goody"
siride
Member since:
2006-01-02

There's shitty music today and there was shitty music back then. You can't judge one period by its best music and another by its worst.

Reply Parent Score: 7

RE[3]: Oh goody
by WorknMan on Sun 28th Jul 2013 18:44 in reply to "RE[2]: Oh goody"
WorknMan Member since:
2005-11-13

There's shitty music today and there was shitty music back then. You can't judge one period by its best music and another by its worst.


Dude, this is just a track I picked off the radio at random. I doubt this is the worst that this generation has to offer. Here's another:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoVg5dG6o_Q

The second one actually charted at #14 on the Billboard 100. I challenge you to find me ANYTHING prior to 2000 this bad, and was a radio hit. Not even JJ Fad could suck worse than this. There is NO denying that mainstream music today is worse than it has ever been. Hell, I'd rather listen to disco, and I'm a child of the 80's.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: Oh goody
by righard on Sun 28th Jul 2013 19:04 in reply to "RE[3]: Oh goody"
righard Member since:
2007-12-26

Good music is still being made, you won't find it on the radio though.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[4]: Oh goody
by siride on Sun 28th Jul 2013 19:11 in reply to "RE[3]: Oh goody"
siride Member since:
2006-01-02

De gustibus non est disputandum.

The top songs are what are played in clubs and bars or on the radio where people want background music to some other task. The Billboard Top 100 has rarely been the home to the best music. You always have to look outside of that. There is plenty of good music being produced today, and some of it actually makes it big. Indie rock has had a few breakthroughs, for example. I don't particularly care for the more popular songs, but I have to give them credit for being more artistically competent than the more generic schlock.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: Oh goody
by siraf72 on Sun 28th Jul 2013 19:38 in reply to "RE[3]: Oh goody"
siraf72 Member since:
2006-02-22

I challenge you to find me ANYTHING prior to 2000 this bad, and was a radio hit. Not even JJ Fad could suck worse than this.There is NO denying that mainstream music today is worse than it has ever been. Hell, I'd rather listen to disco, and I'm a child of the 80's.


Barbie Girl - Aqua
Blue - Eiffel 65
Mr. Vain - Culture Beat

Do you want me to keep going?

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[4]: Oh goody
by Vanders on Sun 28th Jul 2013 23:41 in reply to "RE[3]: Oh goody"
Vanders Member since:
2005-07-06

I'm going to be entirely honest here: I'm 34, and that's better than a lot of the shit that was floating around in the 90's. Like someone else said: Barbie Girl, anyone?

Reply Parent Score: 3