Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 28th Jul 2013 14:06 UTC
General Development "There is a reason I use 'old' languages like J or Lush. It's not a retro affectation; I save that for my suits. These languages are designed better than modern ones. There is some survivor bias here; nobody slings PL/1 or Cobol willingly, but modern language and package designers don't seem to learn much from the masters. Modern code monkeys don't even recognize mastery; mastery is measured in dollars or number of users, which is a poor substitute for distinguishing between what is good and what is dumb. Lady Gaga made more money than Beethoven, but, like, so what?" This isn't just a thing among programmers. The entire industry is obsessed with user numbers, number of applications, and other crap that is meaningless when you consider programming to be art. When I post a new item about some small hobby operating system, the comments will be filled with negativity because it's no Windows or iOS, whereas only ten years ago, we'd have lively discussions about the implementation details. And then people wonder why that scene has died out.
Thread beginning with comment 568191
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Oh goody
by panzi on Sun 28th Jul 2013 18:33 UTC in reply to "RE: Oh goody"
Member since:

There is still good music made:
Zoe Keating:
Theophany: (ok, that's a remix of something from 2000; download:
Florence and the Machine:
Floex (Tomáš Dvořák):
The Dresden Dolls:
The Tallest Man on Earth:
Vienna Teng:

And even auto-tune can be used in a good way:
Ellen McLain+Jonathan Coulton:

Ok, none of this is "Bach" or "The Beatles", and none of it has any chance to get into the album charts. But when ever where good music in the charts? I guess you have to go back to The Beatles for that. Just don't listen to the radio. Listen to "The Internet". ;)

Also there is some low-quality music on YouTube that is still enjoyable because it is high-fun (probably only works if you're in the fandom; again auto-tune):

Reply Parent Score: 4