Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 28th Jul 2013 14:06 UTC
General Development "There is a reason I use 'old' languages like J or Lush. It's not a retro affectation; I save that for my suits. These languages are designed better than modern ones. There is some survivor bias here; nobody slings PL/1 or Cobol willingly, but modern language and package designers don't seem to learn much from the masters. Modern code monkeys don't even recognize mastery; mastery is measured in dollars or number of users, which is a poor substitute for distinguishing between what is good and what is dumb. Lady Gaga made more money than Beethoven, but, like, so what?" This isn't just a thing among programmers. The entire industry is obsessed with user numbers, number of applications, and other crap that is meaningless when you consider programming to be art. When I post a new item about some small hobby operating system, the comments will be filled with negativity because it's no Windows or iOS, whereas only ten years ago, we'd have lively discussions about the implementation details. And then people wonder why that scene has died out.
Thread beginning with comment 568199
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Oh goody
by Wafflez on Sun 28th Jul 2013 19:52 UTC in reply to "RE: Oh goody"
Wafflez
Member since:
2011-06-26

Hey PHP is great, majority of "thedailywtf" type articles are because of PHP.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Oh goody
by lucas_maximus on Sun 28th Jul 2013 22:27 in reply to "RE[2]: Oh goody"
lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

A lot of the code highlighted is VB.NET and VB6, which I think are a pure filth but I can code extremely quickly in.

Reply Parent Score: 2