Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 28th Jul 2013 14:06 UTC
General Development "There is a reason I use 'old' languages like J or Lush. It's not a retro affectation; I save that for my suits. These languages are designed better than modern ones. There is some survivor bias here; nobody slings PL/1 or Cobol willingly, but modern language and package designers don't seem to learn much from the masters. Modern code monkeys don't even recognize mastery; mastery is measured in dollars or number of users, which is a poor substitute for distinguishing between what is good and what is dumb. Lady Gaga made more money than Beethoven, but, like, so what?" This isn't just a thing among programmers. The entire industry is obsessed with user numbers, number of applications, and other crap that is meaningless when you consider programming to be art. When I post a new item about some small hobby operating system, the comments will be filled with negativity because it's no Windows or iOS, whereas only ten years ago, we'd have lively discussions about the implementation details. And then people wonder why that scene has died out.
Thread beginning with comment 568284
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[10]: Oh goody
by siraf72 on Mon 29th Jul 2013 12:03 UTC in reply to "RE[9]: Oh goody"
Member since:

You sir, are clearly a gentleman of great learning with a highly refined taste of what is excellent in life. I raise my imaginary glass to you.

Edited 2013-07-29 12:04 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[11]: Oh goody
by MOS6510 on Mon 29th Jul 2013 12:06 in reply to "RE[10]: Oh goody"
MOS6510 Member since:

Well, that's a first. :-)

Most people react less positive when they hear the rap I listen to.

Reply Parent Score: 3