Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 1st Aug 2013 09:36 UTC
Legal Recently, the ITC ruled in favour of Samsung, issuing an exclusion order against certain Apple products, barring them from being sold in the US. Several people have called upon president Obama to step in and overrule the decision (e.g. this guy) - however, not only would this set a very bad precedent for non-US companies, it would also simply be incredibly unfair if you actually look at the ITC ruling itself. Because of this, it is quite unlikely that Obama will step in.
Thread beginning with comment 568593
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Comment by Nelson
by Liza on Thu 1st Aug 2013 13:46 UTC in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by Nelson"
Liza
Member since:
2013-08-01

Your claimed opinion does not make something a fact. Especially given that you've told really obvious falsehoods several times, both in the article itself and in the comments here. (EG: you're assuming your audience isn't aware of the history of these cases and so you can claim Apple is the aggressor.) Or you just don't care what the truth is.

If you want to convince people this isn't a standards essential patent, please explain-- or better yet, give examples-- of someone implementing the given standard without violating it.

Of course to do that, you'd have to actually understand the technology.... and in my experience with patent discussions on the internet, people usually make claims with no understanding of any technology at all. (It's much easier to not be bothered by pesky facts.)

So, prove it.

Reply Parent Score: -1