Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 31st Jul 2013 14:12 UTC
Internet & Networking From The Guardian:

A top secret National Security Agency program allows analysts to search with no prior authorization through vast databases containing emails, online chats and the browsing histories of millions of individuals, according to documents provided by whistleblower Edward Snowden.

The NSA boasts in training materials that the program, called XKeyscore, is its "widest reaching" system for developing intelligence from the internet.

This is not PRISM - but a different system. The slides are damning, as always.

It validates claims made by Edward Snowden, and makes it clear that US government officials have been lying all along. There's no court order required for any of this - in a supposedly modern democracy. Crazy.

Thread beginning with comment 568674
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by kwan_e
by kwan_e on Fri 2nd Aug 2013 00:26 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by kwan_e"
Member since:

Primitive by comparison, yes. Ineffective, I doubt.

If we're talking machine-gun vs. semi-auto, then machine-guns are really only more-effective at two things: keeping heads down, and chewing through ammunition.

As for jeeps, tanks, helicopters and the like. All could be stolen if you've got firearms.

Missiles and bombs? If you think the government is unpopular now, wait until they start dropping munitions on the homeland. That assumes enough of the military sides with the government to actually man those jets and bombers, and that those left will actually comply with orders to bomb their countrymen.

This is somewhat hypothetical, but every time someone says "Herp. Derp. Don't bring a gun to a tank fight!" -- well, I'd like to remind then that a loose collective guys in caves with AKs and cold-war-era RPGs have been resisting the entire, unbridled might of the American military for... 12 years now.

Now add to that the fact that if even 10 percent of American gun owners actually felt strongly enough to start shooting over it, that's still an army of over 3 million -- literally larger than any standing army in the world today.

Given that the government's response would be with tied hands, defection of military and civilian security forces, and facing an overwhelming, distributed force, I bet Washington would fall faster than Baghdad did.

Scenario: They disable your electricity supply. They blockade all interstate highways to your state. They instigate a no fly zone above your state.

Your army of 3 million. Untrained. Overweight. Believes in Biblical miracles to do some of its fighting. Accustomed to creature comforts.

Can you stop your army of 3 million from looting and raping? Can you stop your army of 3 million from turning on each other due to ideological differences?

These are the things that are going to turn the American people against you. Because it's a civil war situation, former anti-gun people would see no problem taking up arms to defend themselves against your undisciplined vigilante mercenary army.

Given that the government's response would be with tied hands

And this is the reason why you retards will never win. No successful military general assumes their enemy will behave exactly as they IMAGINE. Nothing is a GIVEN.

Have you even read anything about world history and military operations?

Reply Parent Score: 4