Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 3rd Aug 2013 20:34 UTC
Legal The Obama administration:

After extensive consultations with the agencies of the Trade Policy Staff Committee and the Trade Policy Review Group, as well as other interested agencies and persons, I have decided to disapprove the USITC's determination to issue an exclusion order and cease and desist order in this investigation.

Lots of talk about SEPs and FRAND in Obama's decree, which means that the Obama administration contradicts everything the ITC has said. To freshen your memory, the ITC ruled that not only was the patent in question not a standard essential patent, but Samsung's offer was actually proper FRAND:

Additionally, the Commission found that there were still disputed issues concerning the patent at issue was even actually essential to the standard (and therefore whether a FRAND or disclosure obligation applied at all).


The Commission analyzed the history of negotiations between Apple and Samsung (this portion is heavily redacted) to see if Apple showed that Samsung failed to negotiate “in good faith,” and found that Apple failed to do so. Notably, the Commission dismissed Apple’s arguments that (1) Samsung’s initial offer was so high as to show bad faith, and (2) Samsung’s attempts to get a cross-license to Apple’s non-SEPs violated its FRAND commitments.

In other words, the Obama administration threw out virtually everything the ITC has said in order to protect Apple. This effectively means that American companies can infringe on non-American companies' (standard essential) patents all they want, because the president will simply step in if they try to fight back.

So, I was wrong. I expected the Obama administration to be impartial and not give such a huge slap in the face of the ITC - as cynical as I usually am, I can still be naive. Protectionism is more important to the POTUS.

Thread beginning with comment 568815
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by majipoor
by majipoor on Sat 3rd Aug 2013 22:36 UTC
Member since:

Even EU agrees with Obama:

Only Thom is 100% sure that the ITC (a US commission BTW) cannot be wrong against the opinion of so many actors, both in US and in Europe.

Let's see what will be his opinion when the ITC ban a Samsung smartphone for an Apple patent violation soon.

Reply Score: 4

RE: Comment by majipoor
by Carewolf on Sat 3rd Aug 2013 23:19 in reply to "Comment by majipoor"
Carewolf Member since:

It a different case, and only an investigation not a verdict or ruling.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE: Comment by majipoor
by leos on Sun 4th Aug 2013 03:45 in reply to "Comment by majipoor"
leos Member since:

Let's see what will be his opinion when the ITC ban a Samsung smartphone for an Apple patent violation soon.

Yep, I can imagine the outrage. In fact we've already seen in in the cases where Apple won.

It's a comedy, since all this money goes into lawsuits and then there is no reward. Some more of that and maybe these companies will learn that they might as well save themselves the legal costs. Same goes the other way with Apple's victory over Samsung on design patents. That will get drawn out forever and I'm sure eventually the award will be zero or insignificant, while the legal costs will be in the tens or hundreds of millions.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE: Comment by majipoor
by cdude on Sun 4th Aug 2013 20:40 in reply to "Comment by majipoor"
cdude Member since:

They need to agree else press may publish some new scandals about european leaders. See, that investment into NSA pays out!

Reply Parent Score: 1