Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 12th Aug 2013 11:01 UTC, submitted by Matt
SkyOS This is surprising.

We suggest using VMWare Player (Windows/Linux) or VMWare Fusion (MacOS) to run the Live CD or install the beta. Install SkyOS to your harddisk or run the Live CD natively on your own risk!

To run SkyOS in VMWare just:

  • create a new virtual machine and point it to the ISO image you downloaded
  • give it at least 2GB of RAM
  • use a virtual IDE harddisk (we don't suggest using a physical partition in order to prevent possible data loss)
  • optionally Install SkyOS from the running Live CD to get all available applications and utilities

SkyOS was quite prominent on OSNews between 2003-2008 - it was coded virtually entirely by Austrian Robert Szeleney in his free time. It achieved a relatively usable state on the desktop - especially considering it was a one man project - but it did suffer from what I call the 'ooh shiney!'-syndrome - it was a hobby project for Szeleney, and as such, focus tended to shift around quite often, depending on whatever he wanted to work on at that time.

SkyOS originally started out as a mere bootloader, but eventually expanded into becoming an entire operating system. In the early days - up until version 4.x - SkyOS was freely available, but it wasn't open source (I believe the 1.x versions may have been, though, I can't recall). After that, Szeleney started charging a small fee for access to the SkyOS 5 beta, which some considered controversial. The SkyOS 5.0 release cycle started with its first alpha release in December 2003, and ended with the release of beta build 6947 in August 2008 - a final release never materialised.

The project seemed to fizzle out, but Szeleney did experiment with using third party kernels, like a BSD kernel or a Linux kernel. That was the last we heard of it - and earlier this year, the website went dark.

So, it's quite a surprise to see that over the weekend, Szeleney has made the last beta release of SkyOS 5.0 - build 6947 - available for free. I somehow doubt we'll see development pick up again, but it's nice to have the latest release out in the open for everyone to play with.

Thread beginning with comment 569477
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by v_bobok
by umccullough on Tue 13th Aug 2013 00:59 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by v_bobok"
umccullough
Member since:
2006-01-26

Oh Jesus, internetters. Obviously, I meant consumer OSes. Linux is still largely irrelevant to the average Joe, because it just doesn't exist "user-facing" in many places. Embedded sure, but this is a for-desktop OS.


But arguably, in the world of closed source operating systems, there isn't much room for new players. The existing players in this space have been grandfathered in for many years - and even Android arguably has gained the traction it has *because* it is largely open source.

In my opinion, SkyOS has failed primarily because it is closed source at this point. At least if it was FOSS, it would have had a chance at continuation. And given the way SkyOS fell off the face of the earth, I can't really justify putting any time and effort into a non-FOSS hobby OS at this point.

The OP is right - it's 2013, the only hobby OSes that are gaining traction now are FOSS.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[5]: Comment by v_bobok
by Kochise on Tue 13th Aug 2013 06:40 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by v_bobok"
Kochise Member since:
2006-03-03

Open source, yeah, but the Android GUI is sky-rocketing towards simplicity, what Gnome/KDE are not. An operating system, like its name sound, is to operate a computer. If the average Joe cannot operate a computer under Gnome/KDE but can a tablet under Android, don't look at the underlying OS, but the user interface.

How many times had you to configure drivers, printers and sound input/output under Android ? Sounds silly ? Install a barebone command line Linux OS on a tablet, ask some people to start X and install package under sudo. Sudo ? Whatcha talkin bout Willis ?

Like you said, Linux desktop will never succeed since it's already -20% cooler than Windows and Mac OS X desktop experience. Until this issue is solved (ElementaryOS Luna ?) there's no hope, deal with it. And open source won't change much about this.

Kochise

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[6]: Comment by v_bobok
by Kochise on Tue 13th Aug 2013 10:50 in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by v_bobok"
Kochise Member since:
2006-03-03

Voting me down is NOT what I call an elaborated response. I can understand you have no arguments against a pragmatic ascertainment of the current state of computer science in general, Linux in particular. It is just coward. Either improve the Linux desktop experience (after all, Linux's sources are open) or pass by...

Kochise

Reply Parent Score: 1