Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 19th Aug 2013 17:27 UTC
Linux Steve Cheney:

There's more to the platform wars than mobile - Android is starting to take off in non-mobile markets in a massive way - Internet of Things, Television (Chromecast), etc. To date Linux has been the dominant OS but Android is now taking some embedded designs which would have run Linux. The effective decoupling of Android from carriers for non-mobile markets + the richness of tools and the existing developer ecosystem will likely cement Android as the definitive open source OS of the next decade. This will have pluses for Google but also unintended consequences.

A common misconception among people who don't really understand what Linux is - one that I'm seeing pop up more and more now that people are trying to paint Android in a negative light - i.e., as competition to not just iOS, but also the noble and open source Linux.

Repeat after me: Android is just as much 'Linux' as Ubuntu, Debian, Red Hat, or anything else that uses the Linux kernel. Technically, a better term would be 'Linux distribution', since Linux in and of itself is just a kernel. Wikipedia defines 'Linux distribution' quite well:

A Linux distribution (often called distro for short) is a member of the family of Unix-like operating systems built on top of the Linux kernel. Such distributions are operating systems including a large collection of software applications such as word processors, spreadsheets, media players, and database applications. These operating systems consist of the Linux kernel and, usually, a set of libraries and utilities from the GNU Project, with graphics support from the X Window System. Distributions optimized for size may not contain X and tend to use more compact alternatives to the GNU utilities, such as BusyBox, uClibc, or dietlibc.

Android is a Linux distribution, and is an addition to the Linux ecosystem - not a challenger. Painting it as such is just a sign of ignorance.

Thread beginning with comment 570099
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

NVidia does not violate the GPL, they just have a small open source part that expose a new kernel interface that their binary driver can use. The android device drivers do not bother to do that.

Reply Parent Score: 3

silviucc Member since:

So now you accuse Samsung and other manufacturers of violating the GPL? Where's your proof?

Reply Parent Score: 1

Carewolf Member since:

Try requesting the source code for your Android device.

Edit: The flagship devices can provide it (The Nexus devices are famous for actually abiding by the GPL). The problem is all the rest. The issue comes up when a user or third party want to change the devices. Most third parties are now forced to using the official Android kernel, because the drivers are only available as binary or sometimes obfuscated source code.

Edited 2013-08-20 10:38 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4