Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th Aug 2013 10:39 UTC
In the News Another checkmark in our road towards a totalitarian society: government intimidating the free press, destroying materials, and threatening to take them to court - to shut down a newspaper. No joke. The British government demanded that The Guardian hand over all materials related to Edward Snowden so that they could be destroyed. If the newspaper did not comply, the British government would go to court to shut down The Guardian.

The mood toughened just over a month ago, when I received a phone call from the centre of government telling me: "You've had your fun. Now we want the stuff back." There followed further meetings with shadowy Whitehall figures. The demand was the same: hand the Snowden material back or destroy it. I explained that we could not research and report on this subject if we complied with this request. The man from Whitehall looked mystified. "You've had your debate. There's no need to write any more."

During one of these meetings I asked directly whether the government would move to close down the Guardian's reporting through a legal route - by going to court to force the surrender of the material on which we were working. The official confirmed that, in the absence of handover or destruction, this was indeed the government's intention.

The newspaper told the government that even if they did comply, it would be pointless - all the materials related to Snowden had already been spread throughout the world, the actual editing was done in New York, the journalist in question (Greenwald) lived in Brazil - but the British government stood fast.

And so one of the more bizarre moments in the Guardian's long history occurred - with two GCHQ security experts overseeing the destruction of hard drives in the Guardian's basement just to make sure there was nothing in the mangled bits of metal which could possibly be of any interest to passing Chinese agents. "We can call off the black helicopters," joked one as we swept up the remains of a MacBook Pro.


Thread beginning with comment 570300
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

And now, using hyperbole to complain about inaccuracy. Fascinating.

Reply Parent Score: 1

lucas_maximus Member since:

The OP said that most British people believe in Nationalism which simply isn't true, however we do like our quaint measurements and our currency that has the Queen's head on it.

I simply disputed the fact that most were Nationalists, because living 29 years in the UK (before I became an Expat) I saw very little evidence of it (however in the previous generation to mine, it was somewhat ... but still not massively).

So f--k off why don't you with claiming hyperbole bollox, because I wasn't making any exaggerated claims.

Edited 2013-08-21 20:53 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

benytocamela Member since:

You know you can quote the words the previous poster used directly, right? They are there still for everyone to see by the way. So there is no need for you to reinterpret them by adding your own particular spin. Specially when bringing a point about your perceived lack of accuracy by others, unless you're into the whole irony thing.

BTW You can totally say "fuck off" and "bollocks." I'm an adult.

Reply Parent Score: 1

SlackerD Member since:

And now, using hyperbole to complain about inaccuracy. Fascinating.

This isn't Star Trek, and you aren't Science officer Spock.

Reply Parent Score: 2