Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 29th Aug 2013 03:50 UTC
QNX According to a Computerworld article, BlackBerry is exploring putting itself up for sale, as the company falls into 4th place in the mobile market. IDC statistics that show Android leads the mobile market with nearly 80%, iOS has 13.2%, Windows Phone 3.7%, and BlackBerry 2.9%. Gartner analyst Bill Menezes states that even new ownership is "not going to address how the company restores itself."

One key asset BlackBerry owns is QNX, the real-time based OS it bought in 2010. QNX is microkernel based, versus the monolithic kernel used by many OS's like Linux. BlackBerry bases its tablet and phone OS's on QNX, which also remains a popular commercial OS for embedded systems.
Thread beginning with comment 570897
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by Nelson
by Nelson on Thu 29th Aug 2013 12:08 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by Nelson"
Nelson
Member since:
2005-11-29

Nokia outsold BBRY and has been posting double digit gains for three consecutive quarters. If the trend continues, they'll crack the Top 5 OEMs before the year ends. All indicators suggest the trend will indeed continue into Q3.

Meanwhile BBRY will go the way of Palm. Inconvenient truth for you or not, but that's how things are going.

This is what Nokia would be going through had they stuck with MeeGo.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Comment by Nelson
by dpJudas on Thu 29th Aug 2013 22:52 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Nelson"
dpJudas Member since:
2009-12-10

Nokia outsold BBRY and has been posting double digit gains for three consecutive quarters. If the trend continues, they'll crack the Top 5 OEMs before the year ends. All indicators suggest the trend will indeed continue into Q3.

Meanwhile BBRY will go the way of Palm. Inconvenient truth for you or not, but that's how things are going.

This is what Nokia would be going through had they stuck with MeeGo.


I have no stake in Blackberry or in MeeGo. What I found amusing about your line was the way that you see everything-Microsoft as good/superior. By the way, that doesn't have to mean you are wrong, although I think the long term verdict of both WinPhone and Nokia is still to be seen.

What would have happened if BBRY had chosen WinPhone, or if Nokia and BBRY had both chosen to do Android phones we will never know. Likewise it is hard to predict the outcome if a much larger player like Nokia had seriously pushed MeeGo phones. Yet you managed to state as fact in one line the only true solution. ;)

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Comment by Nelson
by Nelson on Fri 30th Aug 2013 01:36 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Nelson"
Nelson Member since:
2005-11-29

Nokia is starting to ramp up volumes, launch new phones every three months, and improve its financial position.

That's more success than BBRY is enjoying now. A BBRY/MSFT deal would've kept them relevant as well as all but assured their enterprise grip.

Compared to what they have now, it is unlikely they could've done any worse if they tried

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Comment by Nelson
by bert64 on Fri 30th Aug 2013 16:42 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Nelson"
bert64 Member since:
2007-04-23

Getting back into the top 5? Nokia were number 1 in phones for many years, so overall they have fallen a huge way.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[4]: Comment by Nelson
by Nelson on Fri 30th Aug 2013 20:05 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Nelson"
Nelson Member since:
2005-11-29

Getting back into the top 5? Nokia were number 1 in phones for many years, so overall they have fallen a huge way.


I never understand why people bring this up, its obvious that they aren't where they were. What should also be a self evident truth is that you don't get back there overnight (if at all), and they don't need to be back there to "right the ship" so to speak.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Comment by Nelson
by pgquiles on Sat 31st Aug 2013 23:38 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Nelson"
pgquiles Member since:
2006-07-16

This is what Nokia would be going through had they stuck with MeeGo.


Huh? No, let me get this straight to you, from a developer point of view.

Every developer on Earth was on bed with Nokia going MeeGo and Qt. Everybody. We were all delighted because the portability of Qt meant we could develop a single C++ codebase and reuse most of it. You could have gone and ask the top 1,000 development houses and they all had said "yes, we are going to develop for MeeGo" without blinking.

Now, when Nokia decided to change from MeeGo to Windows Phone 7.5, 99% of the developers thought Nokia was crazy. They lost most of the developer community and nobody can tell me otherwise because I saw it from inside!

WP 7.5 required to develop from scratch because you could only do .NET or Silverlight (which is WPF "light"). Who was going to develop for WP 7.5? Nobody. The few developers who had tried to develop for WP7 had lost it all because nobody was buying WP devices. Not only that, WP 7.5 was so crappy it was plain impossible to get something decent done on that platform!

If Nokia had kept on the MeeGo plan, they would be #2 today (behind Android because, you know, every brand and their neighbor are releasing Android phones).

Edited 2013-08-31 23:38 UTC

Reply Parent Score: -1

RE[4]: Comment by Nelson
by Nelson on Sun 1st Sep 2013 00:24 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Nelson"
Nelson Member since:
2005-11-29


Huh? No, let me get this straight to you, from a developer point of view.


This should be interesting.


Every developer on Earth was on bed with Nokia going MeeGo and Qt. Everybody. We were all delighted because the portability of Qt meant we could develop a single C++ codebase and reuse most of it.


It is interesting, because every developer on Earth does not use Qt, or even cared about MeeGo. Let's tone down the exaggerations a bit. It may be fair to say a sizable amount were interested in MeeGo, but was it more than the 30,000 Windows Phone developers Microsoft had around launch?

And is the potential target demographic for Qt larger than for .NET? There are an estimated 8 million .NET developers (as of 2012).


You could have gone and ask the top 1,000 development houses and they all had said "yes, we are going to develop for MeeGo" without blinking.


That's completely unfounded and speculative on your part.


Now, when Nokia decided to change from MeeGo to Windows Phone 7.5, 99% of the developers thought Nokia was crazy. They lost most of the developer community and nobody can tell me otherwise because I saw it from inside!


99%? Top 1000 shops? Every developer on earth? Are you going to just keep making statistics up?


WP 7.5 required to develop from scratch because you could only do .NET or Silverlight (which is WPF "light").


It required a rewrite from scratch unless..you used Silverlight or WPF or had an existing .NET application.

There were over 100 million Silverlight downloads and thousands of Silverlight developers, and a ton of Microsoft shops adopted it for LOB purposes.


Who was going to develop for WP 7.5? Nobody. The few developers who had tried to develop for WP7 had lost it all because nobody was buying WP devices.


That's an overstatement. There were tens of thousands of Windows Phone developers at launch. A lot of developers, ones I know personally made a decent amount of money on Windows Phone by being the first in the store -- furthermore Windows Phone growth has accelerated since then and I myself extract a decent amount of revenue from the Store.


Not only that, WP 7.5 was so crappy it was plain impossible to get something decent done on that platform!


Obviously it depends, all platforms have limitations, and there is a lot that Qt and QML make plain difficult.



If Nokia had kept on the MeeGo plan, they would be #2 today (behind Android because, you know, every brand and their neighbor are releasing Android phones).


Hahaha.

Reply Parent Score: 3