Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Sep 2013 22:16 UTC
Apple

Apple's new iPhone 5S, which comes with a fingerprint scanner, won't store actual images of users' fingerprints on the device, a company spokesman confirmed Wednesday, a decision that could ease concerns from privacy hawks.

Rather, Apple's new Touch ID system only stores "fingerprint data", which remains encrypted within the iPhone's processor, a company representative said Wednesday. The phone then uses the digital signature to unlock itself or make purchases in Apple's iTunes, iBooks or App stores.

In practice, this means that even if someone cracked an iPhone's encrypted chip, they likely wouldn't be able to reverse engineer someone's fingerprint.

This seems relatively safe - but then again, only if you trust that government agencies don't have some sort of backdoor access anyway. This used to be tinfoil hat stuff, but those days are long gone.

I dislike the characterisation of privacy "hawks", though. It reminds me of how warmongering politicians in Washington are referred to as 'hawks", and at least in my view, it has a very negative connotation.

Thread beginning with comment 571923
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: wait
by jared_wilkes on Thu 12th Sep 2013 11:30 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: wait"
jared_wilkes
Member since:
2011-04-25

No, RTFComments I left. That is not my point. My point is: the first comment was idiotic and completely misread this post and clearly showed no understanding of what has been said in ANY post. I explicitly stated there is plenty more to learn and that I don't trust anyone.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: wait
by tylerdurden on Thu 12th Sep 2013 18:11 in reply to "RE[5]: wait"
tylerdurden Member since:
2009-03-17

Wow, were we supposed to infer all that from a single RTFM?

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[7]: wait
by jared_wilkes on Thu 12th Sep 2013 18:18 in reply to "RE[6]: wait"
jared_wilkes Member since:
2011-04-25

Based on the general meaning of RTFM (you asked a stupid question, the answer is provided if you just read correctly), votes on my comment, my subsequent comments, and the complete idiocy of the first post: YES!

Edited 2013-09-12 18:21 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3