Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Sep 2013 18:25 UTC
Apple Apple's event is going on right now - and most of the new stuff already leaked weeks and months ahead of time. So, we're getting an iPhone 5S, an iPhone 5C, and iOS7 will be available later this month. I like the design of the 5C more than of the 5S; it's more playful, colourful - harking back to the coloured iMacs and PowerMac G3s. Too bad it doesn't come in red.

The fingerprint sensor in the 5S is interesting, but I wonder how accurate it will be in the real world; on top of that, with all the NSA news, I'm not particularly keen on Apple reading my fingerprint all the time. Supposedly, applications don't have access to it and it's not stored in the cloud, but I have little to no trust for companies.

The biggest news for me is the fact that the iPhone 5S has a new chip - the A7 - which has the honour of being the first 64bit chip inside a smartphone. iOS7 and first party Apple applications are all 64bit, and Xcode obviously supports it. While this obviously future-proofs the platform for more RAM, I wonder what other motives are involved here. ARM desktops and laptops, perhaps?

I doubt 64bit will provide much benefit today, but you have to hand it to Apple: at least they're done with the transition before it's even needed.

Thread beginning with comment 571952
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Coprocessor
by tylerdurden on Thu 12th Sep 2013 19:52 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Coprocessor"
Member since:

So you're insist that a company who did first commercially available 64bit ARM processor a year before anyone, could not add one more block to the SoC?

Yes, 64 bit at this point on mobile devices is irrelevant (it will be until there are a significant number of apps that can use it or require it). Level of integration on a SOC is not.

If apple could have added that block(s), they most definitively would have done so. As I already told you: higher integration, leads to lower production costs (less chips, less packaging, less components on the motherboard, lower overall power consumption) which leads to increased profit margins, which are a integral component in Apple's main strategy.

Some of you don't seem to understand the economic factors that drive the semiconductor industry. If you have the ability and capacity to integrate as much functionality as possible on a SOC design, you most definitively do that. No design team ever has gone "We could totally implement this on a single chip, but instead we will just put this functionality on an external separated chip, just for the hell of it."

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: Coprocessor
by viton on Fri 13th Sep 2013 14:43 in reply to "RE[6]: Coprocessor"
viton Member since:

We could totally implement this on a single chip, but instead we will just put this functionality on an external separated chip, just for the hell of it.
That was their choice. Like it or not. And they obviously have the reason to go this way. I believe M7 die shot will reveal the truth soon.

Reply Parent Score: 2