Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 17th Sep 2013 23:12 UTC
Microsoft

With this release we've created a modern Bing.com experience - one that is faster, cleaner and more visually appealing. We believe that search can be beautiful as well as functional and efficient. With that as our goal, we evaluated fonts, spacing, color, visual scan patterns, the search box and even the underlying code.

My problem with this and recent moves by Google: when I do a regular search, I do not want my search results to be spammed by news, picture, and video results. Bing seems to follow in Google's footsteps by adding irrelevant crap to search results for the sake of looking cool, but at the cost of usability.

I mean, check this screenshot. How much of the page is reserved for actual search results, and not pictures, info boxes, news items, and god knows what else?

Exactly: none.

Thread beginning with comment 572353
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
so which engine?
by bnolsen on Wed 18th Sep 2013 03:27 UTC
bnolsen
Member since:
2006-01-06

Okay...so which search engine currently sucks the least of the ones out there?

Reply Score: 2

RE: so which engine?
by sb56637 on Wed 18th Sep 2013 04:37 in reply to "so which engine?"
sb56637 Member since:
2006-05-11

It depends on your criteria.

In the sense of the best search "engine" strictly speaking, nobody can hold a candle to Google. Its results are still uncannily relevant, thorough, and varied.

However, in terms of presentation of search results, I agree with others that Google has regressed considerably as of late. My personal pet peeve has to do with the link to cached results. It used to always be in the same horizontal location for all results. Now it requires clicking on a little down arrow that is immediately after the URL (which varies in length, so the location is no longer consistent) and then clicking on the popup menu item.

DuckDuckGo has a nice presentation, but its results, like those of Bing, still leave a lot to be desired. Google seems to be the only one that has figured out giving higher priority to the root index page of a top level domain instead of a random subpage as the first result.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: so which engine?
by moondevil on Wed 18th Sep 2013 12:21 in reply to "RE: so which engine?"
moondevil Member since:
2005-07-08

In the sense of the best search "engine" strictly speaking, nobody can hold a candle to Google. Its results are still uncannily relevant, thorough, and varied.


Except they aren't, because Google now takes into consideration your location, language and whatever else they use as input.

As result, as a polyglot person living abroad, I need to always change the Google domain, depending on what I am searching for.

For example, a search query in Germany will return different results than with the Portuguese version of Google.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE: so which engine?
by jgagnon on Wed 18th Sep 2013 11:40 in reply to "so which engine?"
jgagnon Member since:
2008-06-24

I've been using DuckDuckGo for a long time now and have no regrets. About the only thing I go to Google for is image searching. I'll admit it took a few days to retrain my brain.

Reply Parent Score: 4