Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Sep 2013 22:52 UTC
Apple

Apple today announced it has sold a record-breaking nine million new iPhone 5s and iPhone 5c models, just three days after the launch of the new iPhones on September 20. In addition, more than 200 million iOS devices are now running the completely redesigned iOS 7, making it the fastest software upgrade in history.

Impressive.

Thread beginning with comment 573065
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Apples and Oranges
by jared_wilkes on Tue 24th Sep 2013 18:20 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Apples and Oranges"
jared_wilkes
Member since:
2011-04-25

You get ragged on for mostly spouting nonsense and not actually looking at the data as presented that you are questioning. Even now, you can't figure out that if you use the data for 5S/5C ratio, you would get a 29% increase in sales, not worse performance. And you've constantly been moving the goalposts: it's not Apple, it's the media you're questioning; it's not the media you're questioning, it's Apple, but you aren't questioning Apple, you just have suspicions; iPhone 5C is irrelevant because it's like the 4S last year; iPhone 5C is sitting on shelves so the numbers are a lie... Etc.

Edited 2013-09-24 18:23 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Apples and Oranges
by galvanash on Tue 24th Sep 2013 18:23 in reply to "RE[3]: Apples and Oranges"
galvanash Member since:
2006-01-25

You get ragged on for mostly spouting nonsense and not actually looking at the data as presented that you are questioning. Even now, you can't figure out that if you use the data for 5S/5C ratio, you would get a 29% increase in sales, not worse performance.


Um...

5.5 million X .80 = 4.4 million

4.4 million is less than 5 million

At least using, you know, math. Not sure what you are using...

And you've constantly been moving the goalposts: it's not Apple, it's the media you're questioning; it's not the media you're questioning, it's Apple, but you aren't questioning Apple, you just have suspicions; iPhone 5C is irrelevant because it's like the 4S last year; iPhone 5C is sitting on shelves so the numbers are a lie... Etc.


I get it. You don't care about the actual numbers and what they mean relative to previous launches. Thats fine, I don't care. But I questioned the numbers because there was something fishy about them and now we know what it was...

I prefer facts to press releases, but that is just me.

Edited 2013-09-24 18:35 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: Apples and Oranges
by jared_wilkes on Tue 24th Sep 2013 18:40 in reply to "RE[4]: Apples and Oranges"
jared_wilkes Member since:
2011-04-25

Umm, you appear to have made up that 5.5 number and that 80% number.

It's your argument that the 5C is irrelevant. So it being on shelves is irrelevant. The 5S is not sitting on shelves.

So...

3.4x (the number of 5S) + x (the number of 5C) = 9 million

x (the number of 5C) = 2.05 million

3.4x (the number of 5S) = 6.95 million

6.95 million is 39% greater than 5 million. (My previous post I typoed and entered 29%).

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: Apples and Oranges
by jared_wilkes on Tue 24th Sep 2013 18:49 in reply to "RE[4]: Apples and Oranges"
jared_wilkes Member since:
2011-04-25

Myself and several more astute observers have already more thoroughly analyzed the data elsewhere.

Don't suggest I don't care about the data just because I think you've asked foolish questions which are either already answered or immaterial. There are such things as stupid questions.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: Apples and Oranges
by jared_wilkes on Tue 24th Sep 2013 18:41 in reply to "RE[3]: Apples and Oranges"
jared_wilkes Member since:
2011-04-25

I meant to type 39% in my original comment. Apologies.

Reply Parent Score: 2