Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Sep 2013 21:46 UTC
Games

Entertainment is not a one-size-fits-all world. We want you to be able to choose the hardware that makes sense for you, so we are working with multiple partners to bring a variety of Steam gaming machines to market during 2014, all of them running SteamOS.

Where Sony and Microsoft follow the iOS model for consoles, Valve is aiming for the Android model, including Valve's own line of 'Nexus' devices. As Valves notes, no restrictions - you can change the hardware, software, and install any operating system you want. The right approach, obviously.

The cooperation between Valve and NVIDIA is quite close, as NVIDIA details on its blog:

Engineers from Valve and NVIDIA have spent a lot of time collaborating on a common goal for SteamOS: to deliver an open-platform gaming experience with superior performance and uncompromising visuals directly on the big screen.

NVIDIA engineers embedded at Valve collaborated on improving driver performance for OpenGL; optimizing performance on NVIDIA GPUs; and helping to port Valve's award-winning content library to SteamOS; and tuning SteamOS to lower latency, or lag, between the controller and onscreen action.

This is going to be big. After being defeated in mobile, it seems Microsoft is facing another frontal assault on another one of its strongholds: gaming, whether it be Windows or Xbox.

Thread beginning with comment 573307
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: You know, for consoles
by Wafflez on Thu 26th Sep 2013 05:44 UTC in reply to "RE: You know, for consoles"
Wafflez
Member since:
2011-06-26

PCs come with keyboard and mouse by default, not normal couch approved controllers like xbox or ps ones, so no, PCs do not have best controllers.

And how is this going to compete with consoles? One OS - okay. But what about one hardware? Graphics do not matter that much when you play from your couch. It's just a PC. Consoles - way different mindset.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: You know, for consoles
by WereCatf on Thu 26th Sep 2013 10:01 in reply to "RE[2]: You know, for consoles"
WereCatf Member since:
2006-02-15

And how is this going to compete with consoles?


To be quite frank, I haven't seen Gabe or Valve themselves placing themselves as trying to compete with consoles, I've only seen commenters on the Internet placing them like that; Valve is just trying to cement their place as the de factor games delivery platform on the PC - market so that if/when Microsoft eventually locks them out of Windows they won't fade away. It's just plain wrong to keep comparing Steam Machines to consoles and think of this as a fight between them when Steam Machines are PCs, not consoles, and this isn't a duel between them, this is them overlapping one another.

Even if Steam Machines never so much as take a single percent of the market share of consoles it's no loss for Valve or considered a failure as long as their plan within the PC - segment works.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: You know, for consoles
by karunko on Thu 26th Sep 2013 12:23 in reply to "RE[3]: You know, for consoles"
karunko Member since:
2008-10-28

Valve is just trying to cement their place as the de factor games delivery platform on the PC - market so that if/when Microsoft eventually locks them out of Windows they won't fade away.

I might be shortsighted but I can't see that happening any time soon. As matter of fact Windows 8 and STEAM have been living happily side by side since I switched from Windows 7 about one year ago -- and in the meantime I've bought quite a few games from STEAM and exactly none from Microsoft's store.

Even if Steam Machines never so much as take a single percent of the market share of consoles it's no loss for Valve or considered a failure as long as their plan within the PC - segment works.

At the moment I can't see the value proposition here: given that I'm already playing all the titles I care about on Windows, what am I going to gain from switching to a different OS/platform? What's Valve going to gain considering that I'm already a customer? Also, my PC is already connected to the TV and no, it's not terribly loud (and the games are far more louder anyway). Why should I want to stream them instead while I wait for "all the AAA titles coming natively to SteamOS in 2014"?

Last but not least: let's not forget that STEAM is a subscription service. True, there's no monthly fee, but that's what it really is. Fail to accept the next modification to their ToS and see how many games you'll be able to play. I seldom go back to a game once I'm done with it, but still...


RT.

Reply Parent Score: 3

allanregistos Member since:
2011-02-10

PCs come with keyboard and mouse by default, not normal couch approved controllers like xbox or ps ones, so no, PCs do not have best controllers.

And how is this going to compete with consoles? One OS - okay. But what about one hardware? Graphics do not matter that much when you play from your couch. It's just a PC. Consoles - way different mindset.


Yes, ok, P.C. might not have the best controller, my mistake. What I have in mind though is that a mouse+keyboard combination is what I prefer when playing games, especially for RTS. However, controller manufacturers can just easily build controls for PCs since after a console is also a computer. If Valve did not have in mind to compete with consoles, it just happened when they want you to use their SteamOS on your living room in addition to your console.

But I will argue on the graphics side, it will matter much for P.C. gamers, more hi-resolution monitor and graphic intensive games, the better even if you play from your couch, it is just console gamers who don't care that much I think.

Reply Parent Score: 2