Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Sep 2013 11:44 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless

Finland is boiling with rage this weekend over the $25 M bonus payment the CEO Stephen Elop is set to receive as he leaves Nokia after his two-year tenure. Questions are now being raised by the oddest aspect of the bonus: the board of Nokia seems to have given Elop a $25 M incentive to sell the handset unit cheaply to Microsoft way back in in 2010. This effectively means that the board hired a man who was given a giant carrot to drive down Nokia's overall valuation and phone volumes while preparing a sale to Microsoft. What could possibly be a reason to structure Elop's original contract in this manner? Did the board in fact end up promising Elop more compensation in case he sells the phone division than if he runs it with modest success?

Vindication. We were right all along.

Thread beginning with comment 573380
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Criminal?
by Morgan on Thu 26th Sep 2013 18:46 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Criminal?"
Morgan
Member since:
2005-06-29

What your argument you've just made, would be the same as saying that that I know gambling because I sit near traders (setting odds for sport bets).


It's not the same thing at all; once again you make assumptions and build a flawed argument around those assumptions. I didn't "sit near" investigators, I worked directly with them, helping them build case files against defendants. I dealt with evidence and chain of custody, and went to court to present evidence. I wasn't just a terminal operator for all fourteen years of my career in law enforcement; I've been everything from a jailer, to dispatcher, warrant clerk, evidence technician, I've worked in the Criminal Investigations and Juvenile Criminal Investigations divisions, and yes, even a lowly terminal operator.

You don't know a damn thing about me so you make something up in your head and continue to make a fool of yourself. I really don't understand that kind of behavior.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[8]: Criminal?
by lucas_maximus on Thu 26th Sep 2013 19:00 in reply to "RE[7]: Criminal?"
lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

That isn't how you described your job previously. While it isn't on this thread, I have got a quite a memory and I will make certain assumptions about your role based on past information you have presented.

It is a picture into your life which you presented on here, not I. It isn't my fault that you didn't make it clear.

Edited 2013-09-26 19:03 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[9]: Criminal?
by Morgan on Thu 26th Sep 2013 19:10 in reply to "RE[8]: Criminal?"
Morgan Member since:
2005-06-29

As I recall, previously I've said that I work in law enforcement. I'm not here to present my résumé, I'm here to discuss technology, like everyone else. It's only when some asshole questions my right to present an informed viewpoint do I feel the need to elaborate. I don't owe you an explanation but I gave you one so you would understand where I'm coming from, and you attack even that gesture.

You're about as loony as they come, mate.

Reply Parent Score: 1