Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Oct 2013 16:07 UTC
Benchmarks

With the exception of Apple and Motorola, literally every single OEM we've worked with ships (or has shipped) at least one device that runs this silly CPU optimization. It's possible that older Motorola devices might've done the same thing, but none of the newer devices we have on hand exhibited the behavior. It's a systemic problem that seems to have surfaced over the last two years, and one that extends far beyond Samsung.

Pathetic, but this has been going on in the wider industry for as long as I can remember - graphics chip makers come to mind, for instance. Still, this is clearly scumbag behaviour designed to mislead consumers.

On the other hand, if you buy a phone based on silly artificial benchmark scores, you deserve to be cheated.

Thread beginning with comment 573868
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
BushLin
Member since:
2011-01-26

Oh god, I forgot what happens what you dare speak against the almighty fruit god. Please don't mistake me for an Android apologist (or an anything apologist).

Just imagine for a moment that you're objective and don't ignore problems:

Are your older Apple devices less responsive or more responsive following their new iOS versions?

Reply Parent Score: 2

TroubleFunk Member since:
2013-10-04

It seems Tony gave you a fairly calm and rational answer.

You respond with some silly "fruit company" comment.

You should probably answer like an adult next time.

Reply Parent Score: 3

BushLin Member since:
2011-01-26

"Tony" tried to misframe the argument.

I was talking about software optimisation in context and unfortunately "Tony" has a well documented history of fitting the stereotype I spoke of.

Are you "Tony" in disguise?

Reply Parent Score: 2

BushLin Member since:
2011-01-26

Are your older Apple devices less responsive or more responsive following their new iOS versions?


Not going to answer that one then eh?

Reply Parent Score: 2