Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Oct 2013 11:34 UTC
Windows

Microsoft is talking to HTC about adding its Windows operating system to HTC's Android-based smartphones at little or no cost, people with knowledge of the matter said, evidence of the software maker's struggle to gain ground in the mobile market.

Terry Myerson, head of Microsoft's operating systems unit, asked HTC last month to load Windows Phone as a second option on handsets with Google's rival software, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the talks are private. Myerson discussed cutting or eliminating the license fee to make the idea more attractive, the people said. The talks are preliminary and no decision has been made, two people said.

I hope HTC and every other Android OEM flips Microsoft the bird. The shoe's on the other foot now, Redmond.

Thread beginning with comment 574048
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by kurkosdr
by Dano on Mon 7th Oct 2013 20:54 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by kurkosdr"
Dano
Member since:
2006-01-22

I am not aware of what goes on in your country, but in the US, there was a time when Linux was offered on PC's in Walmart and other chain stores. They are still offered online from retailers. From what I heard, people purchased them because the price was low (the machines were low end and even lower priced because there was no OS cost), brought them home, booted them up and then found out that their existing software library would not run because Windows was not on there. Because of this, even with the low price, they promptly returned the machine to the store. Many consumers are just not that savvy. They expect the machine to run software that they are used to. My non-tech savvy brother bought an Apple iMac because it was trendy and he does not do much with his computer except for run Safari and check email. He loves the machine and it's stable for his use, but his wife hates it because neither one of them knew that they could not run the wife's applications that they run at work. Of course, we solved this problem by Bootcamping the machine and adding a Windows 7 installation on the side for her stuff; this goes to show you how not savvy consumers are.

It all really boils down to quality applications. Customers don't really care about the OS underneath because they don't even know what an OS is. Besides, there is nothing wrong with Windows for the consumer, so you are trying to provide a solution to something that is not a problem.

http://www.walmart.com/ip/Acer-Black-11.6-Aspire-V5-131-2887-Laptop...

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,589545,00.asp

http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2007/10/200-everex-gree/

Edited 2013-10-07 21:05 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: Comment by kurkosdr
by juzzlin on Tue 8th Oct 2013 05:20 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by kurkosdr"
juzzlin Member since:
2011-05-06

Those were useless netbooks running crappy custom Linux distributions. I'm talking about real Ubuntu PC's here, like:

http://www.dell.com/us/business/p/xps-13-linux/pd
http://www.system76.com/

Not being able to run MS Office, Photoshop etc cannot be the reason, because you cannot run Windows software on a Chromebook either and they are selling pretty well at the moment.

Edited 2013-10-08 05:23 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: Comment by kurkosdr
by Dano on Tue 8th Oct 2013 13:40 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by kurkosdr"
Dano Member since:
2006-01-22

Nah, it's not the apps...or the quality of the system. Can't be that!

Chromebooks really suck and are minuscule part of the market. Chrome can't do much but browse the web but at least they are harder for the consumer to break than Linux. The are just low end toys that people are buying to go online with. The sales success for Chrome is WAY overhyped.

Edited 2013-10-08 13:40 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3