Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 7th Oct 2013 20:54 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y

Samsung's Galaxy Gear television advertisement bears a resemblance to the original iPhone advertisement.

This made me smile, though:

There is just no shame - or original ideas - in this company at all.

Yeah! Except for display technology. Oh, and except for microprocessor design. And, of course, they are a driving force in memory chip design. Well, yeah, except for all those things from which virtually every computer product today benefits - Apple or otherwise - Samsung has absolutely no innovative ideas at all. What have the Romans done for us, indeed.

I don't care about Samsung any more than I care about other companies, but to shove the company's contributions to technology aside just because you lack the capacity to grasp the kind of more bare metal innovation they do just makes you look like an idiot.

Thread beginning with comment 574072
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Pot & Kettle
by majipoor on Tue 8th Oct 2013 07:23 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Pot & Kettle"
majipoor
Member since:
2009-01-22

Who's to say that Samsung didn't also get "inspired" by the original and not the iPhone ad?


Do you believe yourself in that theory?

Reply Parent Score: -1

RE[4]: Pot & Kettle
by Soulbender on Tue 8th Oct 2013 08:24 in reply to "RE[3]: Pot & Kettle"
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

Does it really matter? Apple stole the concept and Samsung in turn stole it (or got "inspired") from either Apple or the original artist.

Edited 2013-10-08 08:25 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: Pot & Kettle
by majipoor on Tue 8th Oct 2013 08:44 in reply to "RE[4]: Pot & Kettle"
majipoor Member since:
2009-01-22

It does seems to matter to you.

Apple stole nothing unless the concept was somehow copyrighted.

Apple got inspiration from an idea (not related to their business) as any company do.

Samsung did get inspiration too and they have the right to do it. The problem is that they obviously get inspiration from their direct competitor and that it is just another similar story from a company which seems to be unable to be a great artist.

Because I guess you know the "artists copy, great artists steal" mantra from Picasso quoted by Steve Jobs, but I would bet you don't understand it as many.

Apple is a great artist and Samsung an artist. Whether or not you can see the difference is your problem.

Samsung has every right to be just a (bad) artist only able to get inspiration from their competitors (Apple today, Nokia in the past). It is just lame.

Edited 2013-10-08 08:48 UTC

Reply Parent Score: -1