Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th Oct 2013 21:46 UTC
Google

Until now, Google hasn't talked about malware on Android because it did not have the data or analytic platform to back its security claims. But that changed dramatically today when Google's Android Security chief Adrian Ludwig reported data showing that less than an estimated 0.001% of app installations on Android are able to evade the system's multi-layered defenses and cause harm to users. Android, built on an open innovation model, has quietly resisted the locked down, total control model spawned by decades of Windows malware. Ludwig spoke today at the Virus Bulletin conference in Berlin because he has the data to dispute the claims of pervasive Android malware threats.

This is exactly the kind of data we need, and Google has revealed it all. So, less than 0.001% of application installations on Android - and this specifically includes applications outside of Google Play! - are able to get through Android's multiple layers of security. In other words, saying Android is insecure is a lie.

Thanks to OSNews reader tkeith for pointing out this article.

Thread beginning with comment 574168
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Thats disingenous...
by Radio on Wed 9th Oct 2013 08:22 UTC in reply to "Thats disingenous..."
Radio
Member since:
2009-06-20

Please, if u think they are malware, challenge them in court.

How DARE a fitness app track my location!

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Thats disingenous...
by Kivada on Wed 9th Oct 2013 08:43 in reply to "RE: Thats disingenous..."
Kivada Member since:
2010-07-07

Please, if u think they are malware, challenge them in court.

How DARE a fitness app track my location!

Ever heard of a step counter/pedometer? The modern kind have only existed for 30 years... If your phone has an accelerometer it is able to be used as a pedometer as well, without having to track your location via GPS.

So, you too are apparently willing to sell yourself out completely just to not have a second device on you the size of a lapel pin like the model Nike sells? I guess there really is a sucker born every minute.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Thats disingenous...
by bhtooefr on Wed 9th Oct 2013 10:04 in reply to "RE[2]: Thats disingenous..."
bhtooefr Member since:
2009-02-19

Because, you know, there's no legitimate reason at all to want GPS tracking of fitness data.

At all.

You would never want to know how fast you are on a given route, and compare with other people. Or record a route, and then follow that route later.

(Myself, I use a Garmin Edge for cycling data. I mainly use it because I wanted instrumentation, and it's a pain to get a conventional cycle computer working on a recumbent trike. And, it's more water-resistant and rugged than a smartphone, with much better battery life.)

Reply Parent Score: 5