Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th Oct 2013 23:39 UTC
Google

Dick move extraordinaire by Google.

On Friday, Google announced an update to its terms of service that allows the company to include adult users' names, photos and comments in ads shown across the Web, based on ratings, reviews and posts they have made on Google Plus and other Google services like YouTube.

When the new ad policy goes live Nov. 11, Google will be able to show what the company calls shared endorsements on Google sites and across the Web, on the more than two million sites in Google's display advertising network, which are viewed by an estimated one billion people.

If a user follows a bakery on Google Plus or gives an album four stars on the Google Play music service, for instance, that person's name, photo and endorsement could show up in ads for that bakery or album.

Luckily, we have an opt-out. Go to this page, remove the checkmark at the bottom of the page, and done - Google won't be abusing your personal information for endorsements.

Thread beginning with comment 574505
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
So simple?
by darknexus on Sat 12th Oct 2013 00:26 UTC
darknexus
Member since:
2008-07-15

remove the checkmark at the bottom of the page, and done - Google won't be abusing your personal information for endorsements.

Even this requires you to trust Google. Can we really do that anymore? You're trusting that their "opt out" will be honored. Somehow, I suspect they'll have a way around it.
As for me, I think I'm done with Google services altogether. I was considering, after they stopped shoving ads into my imap inbox, maybe beginning to use Google's services again. I was even considering a switch to Android for my next phone. I think I'm out, though. There's only so much shit I can take before I give up and, while Apple are a pain in the ass at times with iOS, at least they're only a pain in my ass and not my life!
Sorry Google, this is too damn much! I don't care how "open" you are, if this is what you're turning "open" into then I'm out for good.

Reply Score: 3

RE: So simple?
by woegjiub on Sat 12th Oct 2013 02:29 in reply to "So simple?"
woegjiub Member since:
2008-11-25

I want to do the same, but they are still leagues ahead of everyone else in search.

When I DDG something, and need the answer quickly, I find that I'm constantly adding " !g" to everything, because not doing so means lots of scouring irrelevant results.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: So simple?
by bipbip on Sat 12th Oct 2013 10:02 in reply to "RE: So simple?"
bipbip Member since:
2013-06-24

You don't need a google account to use the search service

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: So simple?
by Soulbender on Sat 12th Oct 2013 05:18 in reply to "So simple?"
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

Even this requires you to trust Google. Can we really do that anymore? You're trusting that their "opt out" will be honored. Somehow, I suspect they'll have a way around it.


The same can be said about every single company doing business on the internet. You should trust google no more or less than anyone else.

Edited 2013-10-12 05:18 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: So simple?
by Lennie on Sun 13th Oct 2013 19:27 in reply to "RE: So simple?"
Lennie Member since:
2007-09-22

The same can be said about every single company doing business on the internet. You should trust google no more or less than anyone else.


Yes, I think it will be about the same, Google might have a lot more data and profiles than most, but Google has a lot more to lose if they do something that will offend the general public to much.

Reply Parent Score: 2