Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Mon 18th Jul 2005 03:38 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 5746
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 02/08/10 23:34 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 02/08/10 19:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 02/08/10 19:33 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 02/05/10 23:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 02/05/10 21:50 UTC, submitted by tyrione
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 02/05/10 21:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 02/05/10 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 02/04/10 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 02/04/10 23:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 02/04/10 17:18 UTC



Member since:
2005-07-06
There is a very good reason it's called backwards compatibility.
And the more energy you put into making things work with obsolete technology, the less improvement you get.
C++ is a workable OOP construction kit. But to think it is anything more is delusional.