Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th Oct 2013 23:54 UTC
In the News

Happy Hangul Day! October 9th is a South Korean national holiday held in honor of the invention of the Korean writing system, which experts have called the most "scientific" (also "ingenious," "rational," "subtle," "simple," "efficient," "remarkable") writing system ever devised.

It's a bit outside of OSNews' regular stuff (although not unheard of), but as a language specialist myself, Korean, and Hangul in particular, has fascinated me for quite a while now. In contrast to other writing systems, which have developed over centuries - or millennia - without clear guidance, Hangul was more or less designed and set in stone 600 years ago, specifically for the Korean language. It is an absolutely beautiful alphabet, with a clear structure, and a unique way of organising letters - they are grouped in square morpho-syllabic blocks. To the untrained eye, Hangul may resemble e.g. Chinese characters - however, each 'character' actually consists of several letters.

Even though I'm not a programmer myself, Im pretty sure those of you who are will find Hangul fascinating. Due to its structured nature, it's incredibly easy to learn - I taught myself to read and write Hangul in a matter of days - and once you do take a few hours to grasp the basics, you'll surely come to appreciate its innate beauty and structure.

Thread beginning with comment 574648
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: No.
by maccouch on Mon 14th Oct 2013 13:09 UTC in reply to "RE: No."
Member since:

If we were seriously to make an effort at a "standard" world language, though, I'd favour lojban ("logical language") rather than Esperanto. If we're gonna change languages, as the Koreans did, we might as well follow their lead and switch to something designed to be logical and easy to learn.

You should probably read a bit about Esperanto though. It **is** designed to be logical and easy to learn.

And in fact it is. Also, even though it simply uses the latin alphabet it also has the "one char -> just one sound" feature and the easiest part of esperanto is to learn how to read and pronounce correctly. it's always the same, and after a bit of classes you can pretty much read any text, no matter how complicated it is, even if you don't really understand it.

The most interesting fact, for me, in Esperanto, is how you can pretty much construct a word*, that has a specific meaning and everyone can understand its meaning, even though it doesn't really make any sense in the real world.

* due to the root and suffix/prefix combination/mechanics.

Edited 2013-10-14 13:09 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: No.
by ricegf on Mon 14th Oct 2013 16:04 in reply to "RE[2]: No."
ricegf Member since:

OK, I'll try to read a bit more on it when time permits. Thanks for the extra info!

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: No.
by maccouch on Mon 14th Oct 2013 16:30 in reply to "RE[3]: No."
maccouch Member since:

the wiki is a good infosource but if you want to spend a couple of hours experimenting a bit i highly recommend:

Reply Parent Score: 2