Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th Oct 2013 16:37 UTC
Apple

Insightful article by John Gruber.

So the irony here is that iOS vs. Android (or, if you prefer, iPhone and iPad vs. commodity smartphones and tablets) is in fact a replay Mac vs. Windows - but not in the way that most who make the comparison would have you believe. Judging by its actions, Apple is keenly aware of the lessons to be learned from 20 years ago. To wit, this has nothing to do with focusing on raw market share, and everything to do with keeping the pedal to the metal on design and quality. If Apple maintains a lead over its rivals in those regards, the Mac suggests that Apple can occupy a dominant, stable, long-term position as the profit leader in the mobile market as well - a market that is already bigger than the PC market ever was, and unlike the PC market, is still growing.

As insightful as the article is, it does pivot on the assumption that Apple does, indeed, "[maintain] a lead over its rivals" in design and quality. Design is largely a matter of taste, but as far as quality goes, Apple has, in my view, been surpassed in almost every aspect by Android - at least, when it comes to software. And let's not even get started on internet services, where Apple is a complete and utter joke compared to its competitors. As far as hardware goes, however, Apple's supposed lead is harder to debate - I've held a lot of phones and tablets in my hands over the years, and while many come close to Apple's, I've never held anything that outright surpassed it (save for maybe the HTC One which no one is buying).

Unsurprisingly, Gruber believes Apple does maintain that lead, and as such, arguing his point becomes relatively easy. However, if you ascribe to the view that Android has surpassed iOS in quality (and certainly in design, in my view), it becomes a lot harder to accept that Apple can, this time, avoid the trap it fell into in the '90s.

Now, before people will twist and turn this into me saying Apple is doomed - I don't believe for a second that it is. However, that doesn't mean a repeat of the '90s is somehow magically off the table - Apple has a lot of work to do in order to avoid it. As Tom Dale stated so aptly almost a year ago, "Google is getting better at design faster than Apple is getting better at web services". With Motorola and the Moto X, design might not be the only thing Google is getting better at faster.

Thread beginning with comment 574728
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Different planet?
by abraxas on Tue 15th Oct 2013 20:28 UTC in reply to "Different planet?"
abraxas
Member since:
2005-07-07

Am I living on a different planet?

I still frequently get super slow response on Android tablets, so bad that when a virtual keyboard opens, and I start typing, it takes 5 seconds (!) before the first character appears on screen after pressing the key.

These things NEVER happen for me when using iOS.
Instant response, always.

How can you possibly claim that Android software is of higher quality if they can't even get the basics right?

Heck, you admitted yourself that Android tablets get slower in time. When a year old, they are slower than when new. This reminds me of the Win95 installations with bloated registries that get slower and slower until you reinstall the OS.


It's third party customizations that seem to cause all the problems. As soon as I switched to cyanogenmod all the hiccups in the UI went away. I bet if you had an AOSP tablet you wouldn't notice any delays. So the argument still has merit. Google software is higher quality, especially if you include the apps like Maps, not just the OS. In fact I just recently upgraded my iPhone to iOS7 and it is extremely slow. My Android phone is much faster and smoother.

Reply Parent Score: 2