Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 15th Oct 2013 17:18 UTC
Google

AnandTech has reviewed the new Chromebook 11 from HP/Google.

Chrome OS is extremely purpose built and it is something that should bring about great concern to those at Microsoft. I personally don't have a problem with Windows 8, but purpose built is hardly a phrase that applies to the OS - at least if you're talking about it on a more traditional PC. I suspect by the time we get to Windows 9, Microsoft will have a better answer to the critics of 8/8.1, but that gives Google and its Chrome OS partners at least another year of marketshare erosion. At the beginning of this mobile journey I remember x86 being an advantage for Intel, and we all know what happened to that. Similarly, I remember Windows/Office being advantages for Microsoft. If Microsoft doesn't find a quick solution for making low cost Windows PCs just as well executed as Chrome OS devices, it'll find itself in a world where Windows no longer matters to entry-level/mainstream users.

Apple's taken over the high-end, Google is taking over the low-end, and in mobile, the company barely registers.

Microsoft's next CEO faces a herculean task.

Thread beginning with comment 574810
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[10]: Comment by Stephen!
by lucas_maximus on Wed 16th Oct 2013 15:05 UTC in reply to "RE[9]: Comment by Stephen!"
lucas_maximus
Member since:
2009-08-18

Again it totally depends what percentage of your operating costs are software.

My employer doesn't blink at $200,000 of software for a single pool of servers. At the end of the day that is the same as employing 3 extra developers to build them something similar.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[11]: Comment by Stephen!
by Shane on Wed 16th Oct 2013 16:36 in reply to "RE[10]: Comment by Stephen!"
Shane Member since:
2005-07-06

Google have plenty of money to throw at problems. That's not the issue. They simply rather be in control of their destiny.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[12]: Comment by Stephen!
by lucas_maximus on Wed 16th Oct 2013 16:52 in reply to "RE[11]: Comment by Stephen!"
lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

While that is true, not everyone needs that because not everyone is Google.

While I hate Oracle DB, it does the job and we already have software that is working now that requires it. The cost of licenses is tiny compared to the amount of money is made via it.

Reply Parent Score: 3