Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 29th Oct 2013 15:04 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless

Nokia has just announced its Q3 2013 financial results, revealing an operating profit of EUR118 million ($162 million) from EUR 5.66 billion ($7.8 billion) revenue. That's up massively year over year, but nonetheless represents another quarter of middling results. The report is the first since Microsoft agreed to purchase Nokia's phone business, and that division - Devices and Services - performed as expected, posting a small loss of EUR 86 million ($118 million).

So, Microsoft is buying the part of Nokia that is losing money, while the parts that make money remain in Finland. Seems like a good deal for Nokia-proper. In the meantime, Microsoft will be saddled with a devices division that is still losing money, and whose increase in sales consists largely of low-end, low-margin devices (like the 520). Interesting - especially since Windows Phone was supposed to prevent Nokia participating in a race to the bottom. I'm sure Microsoft's super-successful Surface division welcomes Nokia's devices division.

The cold truth: even more than 2.5 years after announcing the switch to Windows Phone, Nokia's Lumia range still cannot make up for drop in sales of Symbian devices and feature phones. This is roughly the same timeframe in which Samsung rose to the top. With Android.

Read into that what you will.

Thread beginning with comment 575819
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Comment by Nelson
by JAlexoid on Thu 31st Oct 2013 01:23 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by Nelson"
JAlexoid
Member since:
2009-05-19

Yes... Yet, unlike you, we have Nokia's results. You actually have nothing to prove otherwise. The likelihood of it being a low margin device is higher and has more backing evidence than your assertion.

And if you're going demand a factual BOM(that only covers the manufacturing part), then I'll have to ask for the same to prove your side.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[8]: Comment by Nelson
by Nelson on Thu 31st Oct 2013 11:07 in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by Nelson"
Nelson Member since:
2005-11-29

I don't have it, but there is the L900 BOM (~230) and the 520 uses cheaper parts. Assuming they maintain feature phone like margins (which are 26-29%) and you account for price discounting to get it at around $100 you don't arrive at a terribly low margin in my estimation.

I am not factoring sunk marketing dollars into the device though, but then again I don't think it fundamentally applies when those dollars are allocated to Smart Devices as a whole (same with inventory allowances, and in some cases they're reversed like last Q).

Basically fixed costs can and are coming down. That can change. Manufacturing costs are more or less a baseline.

Reply Parent Score: 3