Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Nov 2013 10:04 UTC, submitted by mbpark
Microsoft

Microsoft is generating $2 billion per year in revenue from Android patent royalties, says Nomura analyst Rick Sherlund in a new note on the company.

He estimates that the Android revenue has a 95% margin, so it's pretty much all profit.

This money, says Sherlund, helps Microsoft hide the fact that its mobile and Xbox groups are burning serious cash.

Microsoft has not written a single line of Android code, yet rakes in the profits through scummy software patents. Crime does pay.

Thread beginning with comment 576335
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Re:
by dragos.pop on Thu 7th Nov 2013 11:30 UTC in reply to "Re:"
dragos.pop
Member since:
2010-01-08


They know how to pocket the 30% cut from the Play Store, but when an OEM gets patent-trolled, they are all like "we just offer source code, you are on your own".[\q]

Not the same, Play Store is an optional service and the money they make on it don't seem to cover android development cost.

[q] Anyway, this probably won't continue for ever. Motorola hasn't paid MS a dime in extortion fees, and probably won't, so, once the other OEMs realize that making an Android rom free of MS patents is possible (just do what Moto did), they will stop paying the extortion fee, just like companies stopped paying the linux extortion fee to SCO (but if Google had stepped up to protect Android like IBM did with Linux, the Android extortion fee would have already been history, damn!)


They tried to somehow. I am not saying that they cannot do more, but they did try to form a patent pool to help against trolls. This is why they bought Motorola. They should be more aggressive on this.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Re:
by kurkosdr on Thu 7th Nov 2013 12:28 in reply to "RE: Re:"
kurkosdr Member since:
2011-04-11

They tried to somehow. I am not saying that they cannot do more, but they did try to form a patent pool to help against trolls. This is why they bought Motorola. They should be more aggressive on this.

They should have offered real protection for OEMs, just like Red Hat did. Take the whole responsibility.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Re:
by dragos.pop on Thu 7th Nov 2013 12:43 in reply to "RE[2]: Re:"
dragos.pop Member since:
2010-01-08


They should have offered real protection for OEMs, just like Red Hat did. Take the whole responsibility.


1) Different times
2) Red Hat offered it for customers who payed, not for the free fedora
3) It was important for Red Hat to do this, because they had all kinds of clients, while mobile OEMs are usually huge companies, and also the money asked are not so much, compared to SCO case.

4) I'll give you this: I love google compared to other tech giants, but Red Hat is a true open source company... mentality, business, involvement... Over all the greatest open source company

Reply Parent Score: 3