Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Nov 2013 18:07 UTC
Legal

On Wednesday, the House Judiciary Committee is scheduled to consider legislation aimed at reining in abusive patent litigation. But one of the bill's most important provisions, designed to make it easier to nix low-quality software patents, will be left on the cutting room floor. That provision was the victim of an aggressive lobbying campaign by patent-rich software companies such as IBM and Microsoft.

These companies also happen to have the largest lobbying corruption budgets. This is never going to change.

Thread beginning with comment 577213
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
MOS6510
Member since:
2011-05-12

Just because you want something to be true doesn't make it so.

They haven't sued the most, they haven't patented the most, they don't sue over SEPs, but they are sued the most over patents and they are an "inspiration" to a number of competitors. And funny enough, they aren't on this list.

Reply Parent Score: -1

Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

They have sued more over software patents than Microsoft, Google, Samsung, HTC, Sony, etc. etc. etc.

Sorry, but those are the facts.

Reply Parent Score: 2

MOS6510 Member since:
2011-05-12

Ah, Google the SEP suer (via Motorola of course), but that's just one of the many things you can blame them for. Well, not YOU of course.

All companies, including Apple, do stuff we don't like. You just like to single out Apple and/or promote them to be the biggest baddy of all while you let other companies completely off the hook.

Apple became patent-aggresive after the Google betrayal with Android. Like it or dislike it, but Apple sues within the law and rules. Unlike, let's pick Google and Samsung, who abuse SEPs. Blame the system, not the players.

It's like claiming a sport player is evil, because within the rules he's better than anyone else and promoting players who break the rules in order to stop the best player to heros.

The system is now challenged, but on a list of companies not liking this there is no Apple to be seen, yet still you claim them to be the worst. They are the #1 target for patent trolls. They should love a change of rules.

They can never do any good in your eyes. Even if they do you'll suggest a hidden evil motive.

It's simple, if companies rip off Apple Apple strikes back. But this procedure can be so lengthy and the punishment so small that a company like Samsung will keep doing it because it makes them more money in the end.

Reply Parent Score: 1