Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Dec 2013 19:04 UTC

Absolutely fantastic article by Tracey Lien.

If the selection at the average retailer is anything to go by, girls don't play video games. If cultural stereotypes are anything to go by, video games are for males. They're the makers, the buyers and the players.

There is often truth to stereotypes. But whatever truth there may be, the stereotype does not show the long and complicated path taken to formulate it, spread it and have it come back to shape societal views.

The attitude towards women in video games is even worse when you take online multiplayer into consideration. One of my team mates in League of Legends is a woman, and I've seen some absolutely terrible things being thrown her way in chat - during and even after the game is over. I've also pretended to be female in League of Legends just to see what would happen, and it was just as bad. However, I could just shrug it off - hearing the things guys say while you're pretending to be a woman as an experiment is a hell of a lot different than hearing these things when you're actually a woman.

I even caught myself thinking 'my female team mate should just pretend to be a guy' - but you know what? That's expletive ridiculous. As Lien details in her article, changing the way video games are being marketed would be a very good first step that could most certainly snowball into the future.

Thread beginning with comment 577939
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
by kwan_e on Wed 4th Dec 2013 23:32 UTC
Member since:

Gotta love the comments trying to paint the male gamers as the oppressed/harrassed group. Gotta love those same commenters not understanding the strawman arguments they are making.

Reply Score: 4

RE: Pathetic
by NicePics13 on Thu 5th Dec 2013 10:18 in reply to "Pathetic"
NicePics13 Member since:
RE[2]: Pathetic
by kwan_e on Thu 5th Dec 2013 10:36 in reply to "RE: Pathetic"
kwan_e Member since:

Oh, how brave of you, internet cynic. Keep making strawmen arguments because that's all you're good for.


My record is clear:

- Neil Armstrong
- Alan Turing
- This

Unlike c*nts like you, I can argue for things that don't benefit me directly.

What do I get arguing for Alan Turing or Neil Armstrong against the hoardes of fake-cynics that infest this website?

Edited 2013-12-05 10:38 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3