Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 2nd Jan 2014 19:31 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless

The Verge has an interesting story up detailing the various hardware and software prototypes that could have had a future hadn't HP botched pretty much every aspect of its Palm acquisition. Both in features as well as design, the next version of webOS, codenamed 'Eel', looked quite promising, and the hardware designs certainly stand out too.

Sadly, as I stated in my detailed history of Palm, webOS was, at its core, simply not a Palm product. As I wrote:

A cool UI doesn't hide the fact that it's slow and unresponsive. A cool UI doesn't hide the fact that the underlying system is unoptimised. A cool UI doesn't hide the fact that it sucks battery like a there's no tomorrow. A cool UI doesn't hide the fact that the hardware was of appallingly low quality.

A cool UI doesn't hide the fact that the operating system has absolutely nothing to do with what Palm is supposed to stand for.

WebOS probably looked like the bee's knees to someone used to the version of Android and iOS at the time, but having had a long history using PalmOS products, webOS was a total and utter letdown. WebOS was a badly sewn together set of compromises, unfinished parts and shortcuts - and it showed. From The Verge's article, I get the impression that Eel slapped on a new coat of paint and new user-facing features - but that the lower levels and core of the operating system were still very much the same unoptimised mess.

I'm definitely curious what LG's webOS TV is going to be like - it looks nice - but if it's anything like Palm's and HP's webOS products, it won't light any of my fires.

Thread beginning with comment 579801
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
WebOS
by tkeith on Thu 2nd Jan 2014 20:53 UTC
tkeith
Member since:
2010-09-01

I disagree strongly with your opinion of WebOS. As the owner of three Touchpads, webOS (3.0 at least) was much more polished and responsive than Android of the time. Remember that the Pre ran an old slow single core processor. The touchpad had a dual core that flew. If it weren't for apps, they would all still run webOS. My wife still uses hers with webOS.

This looks even more polished, and with better hardware and HP's resources, it could have been great. So sad that all the computer manufacturers are scrambling to get a tablet or smartphone on the market, HP had all that 2 years ago. Unforgivable that Apotheker let it rot and ruined webOS's future.

Reply Score: 3

RE: WebOS
by umccullough on Thu 2nd Jan 2014 22:36 in reply to "WebOS"
umccullough Member since:
2006-01-26

The touchpad had a dual core that flew. If it weren't for apps, they would all still run webOS. My wife still uses hers with webOS.


I just want to chime in that the Touchpad was not bad hardware... I kept 3 of the 32gb models from the fire sale - two of them are still being used by my wife and me (albeit, running CM9, perhaps soon CM10/11), the 3rd I gave to my father-in-law and he says it's probably the most useful device he's ever owned (also running Android).

They've been quite reliable, and performance is still reasonable given their age.

WebOS was a great concept OS, IMO - it was definitely slow booting, and the browser was pretty much due for complete overhaul. But the lack of apps was what drove me away to Android.

Reply Parent Score: 2