Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Jan 2014 23:05 UTC
Games

Polygon:

A Steam Machine is a PC that can do fewer things, and run fewer games, than the system you have in your home right now.

That's the marketing challenge that’s in front of Valve and its partners, and the fact that Valve had a rare CES press conference was interesting, but there were precious few details about what the platform adds to the world of gaming.

The cold and harsh reality is that six of the top ten games on Steam run on Linux/SteamOS - and with Steam having such a huge base of active subscribers, that's a lot of users covered with just those six games. On top of that, there's almost 300 more Linux games on Steam. In the meantime, the PS4 and Xbox One combined have like 10 games, most of which are available on the Xbox 360/PS3 as well, and the remainder are rushed titles nobody gives two rat's asses about.

The Xbox One and PS4 are sold not on what they offer now, but on what they will offer in the future. I see absolutely no reason why Steam Machines ought to be treated any differently.

Reality check: right now, spending $499 on a Steam Machine gets you access to a lot more games and a lot more functionality than the Xbox One and PS4 offer combined. Of course, a Windows PC will offer even more games (not functionality, Linux has that covered just fine) - but that applies just as well to any console.

I've been baffled these past few days about the attitude of the gaming press towards Steam Machines. The gaming press' reviews of the new consoles was full of "just you wait until the actually good games arrive!/new functionality is added, but here's a 9/10 anyway on that promise!", but for some reason, the same sloppy reviewing is not applied to Steam Machines.

There's a word for that.

Thread beginning with comment 580201
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by MOS6510
by MOS6510 on Wed 8th Jan 2014 13:45 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by MOS6510"
MOS6510
Member since:
2011-05-12

If they can deliver on those missing features they should certainly get the word out and and stop people buying other consoles. Make them stop and wait for something better.

The mayor 3 consoles have been refreshed and people are buying them. Anyone who wants a console already got one or is about to get one. Those who just bought a Wii-U, PS4 or XB1 aren´t going to spend $499 on another console that plays the same games (and not even all of them).

That leaves the people who haven´t bought one yet. The longer you wait the smaller that group becomes. The timing is alrady a bit awkward.

For Valve to succeed they need good consoles, have all the populair games, have some VERY good original titles and be known by the general public.

And I don´t think even then they have a very good chance. The casual gamer is stuck on mobile devices like phones and tablets. Kids go for these to or what their parents buy them, which is what they know and that isn´t Steam.

As history has shown it isn´t always the best idea or even best execution that wins in the end. Sometimes these things can easily be overcome by brute force marketing. Can Valve handle the marketing departments from Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft?

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: Comment by MOS6510
by WereCatf on Wed 8th Jan 2014 13:52 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by MOS6510"
WereCatf Member since:
2006-02-15

If they can deliver on those missing features they should certainly get the word out and and stop people buying other consoles.


Maybe they're still in negotiations with whatever streaming-services they're trying to get or something and don't have a reliable estimate on when they can get the missing features out? I dunno, I'm just guessing, but whatever the reason is they likely don't just feel ready enough yet to start a marketing-campaign.

For Valve to succeed they need good consoles, have all the populair games, have some VERY good original titles and be known by the general public.


Valve is a newcomer to the hardware-market, so they have a lot to prove. And well, what better way to prove yourself than wait until you can deliver a fully-polished product? First impressions are the longest-lasting, so releasing an unpolished thing would just undermine their goals.

As history has shown it isn´t always the best idea or even best execution that wins in the end. Sometimes these things can easily be overcome by brute force marketing. Can Valve handle the marketing departments from Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft?


Aye, the history is full of examples like that and it's certainly possible that Valve's attempt goes out without even a fizzle. I guess we'll just have to wait and see, yes?

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: Comment by MOS6510
by MOS6510 on Wed 8th Jan 2014 13:59 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by MOS6510"
MOS6510 Member since:
2011-05-12

Not me, I stick with my Atari 2600, Commodore 64 and Amiga 1200. Those games can be played with a joystick with one button or a mouse with two in the case of the Amiga.

Any controller with more buttons is too confusing for me. :-p

Reply Parent Score: 2