Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 13th Jan 2014 10:06 UTC
Windows

Paul Thurrott on the next version of Windows and the future of the platform.

In some ways, the most interesting thing about Threshold is how it recasts Windows 8 as the next Vista. It's an acknowledgment that what came before didn't work, and didn't resonate with customers. And though Microsoft will always be able to claim that Windows 9 wouldn't have been possible without the important foundational work they had done first with Windows 8 - just as was the case with Windows 7 and Windows Vista - there's no way to sugarcoat this. Windows 8 has set back Microsoft, and Windows, by years, and possibly for good.

With even Paul Thurrott claiming Windows is in trouble, it becomes virtually impossible to deny it is so.

Thread beginning with comment 580625
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Comment by Nelson
by StuS on Tue 14th Jan 2014 01:10 UTC in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by Nelson "
StuS
Member since:
2012-12-01

Apple is more expensive, but it is not a premium brand.

A premium brand typically implies that the same parent company (in the case of Lexus, Toyota) has a brand that is not premium. Apple has no such thing. If Apple had another brand.. say the myPhone by Orange, that was underpowered, and lacked some nice features, then Apple would be a premium brand.

Simply being more expensive does not make you a premium brand.. at best, if you're lucky and have great marketing (like Apple).. you can convince people you're a luxury brand.. (I'm not convinced, but some people do seem to be).

I won't consider iPhones a luxury until iPhones come with better lumbar support, keep my butt warm, and are a lot more fun to drive.. have an interface that's just confusing in a different way doesn't do it for me ;)

Apple is Jaguar when they were independent, or, in spirit, Audi (ignoring the VW thing), at best.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[9]: Comment by Nelson
by avgalen on Tue 14th Jan 2014 09:47 in reply to "RE[8]: Comment by Nelson "
avgalen Member since:
2010-09-23

[quote]A premium brand typically implies that the same parent company (in the case of Lexus, Toyota) has a brand that is not premium. [/quote]
This is really of topic, but I just wanted to let you know that this is a completely made up fact.
Limiting the existence of a lesser brand to only the parent company makes no sense
Something is not a premium brand because the parent company also has lesser brands. Something is a premium brand because the competition has lesser brands.
But most importantly, something is a premium brand because people think it is. It doesn't even matter if it really is

Reply Parent Score: 4