Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th Nov 2005 18:30 UTC, submitted by psilva
Thread beginning with comment 58097
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Re: Convicted Monopolies offer loss leaders
by on Wed 9th Nov 2005 06:56
in reply to "RE: Re: Convicted Monopolies offer loss leaders"
RE[3]: Re: Convicted Monopolies offer loss leaders
by roccod on Wed 9th Nov 2005 07:59
in reply to "RE[2]: Re: Convicted Monopolies offer loss leaders"
RE[3]: Re: Convicted Monopolies offer loss leaders
by on Wed 9th Nov 2005 09:15
in reply to "RE[2]: Re: Convicted Monopolies offer loss leaders"
Please, Eclipse is not half-baked, or a toy. Well, not for Java anyway. As a long-time satisfied Visual Studio user, I find that there are things I miss when I go back to it after the day job's hacking in Eclipse. Its certainly not perfect, but its a productive environment for Java.
Mind you, this is using Eclipse on XP. I tried it on FC4 using the native compile and was less impressed, but that's really an early port and I've no reason to suspect that on platforms supported by the Sun or IBM JVMs that it will be materially worse.





Member since:
It sounds dumber then it is. GCC, OCaml, FreeBASIC, Freepascal, you name the language there is a FOSS dialect. Then there is Eclipse, KDevelop, Monodevelop, Shaprdevelop and so on for FOSS IDEs. You don’t need to run them on Linux but they ARE ALWAYS FREE and never watered down.