Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 27th Jan 2014 00:02 UTC

Ingrid Lunden explains the significance of the deal (I dislike her headline though, since it falsely implies Google and Samsung were at legal odds):

First, the deal will bolster both Samsung and Google's patent positions against patent infringement allegations and subsequent litigation from competitors, and specifically Apple, which has been involved in acrimonious, multinational patent battles worth billions of dollars against Samsung for years now, over Samsung's Android-powered range of Galaxy smartphones and tablets.

Second, it is a sign of how Google continues to put the patents it gained from its $12.5 billion Motorola acquisition to good use across the Android ecosystem. The ecosystem part is key here. I personally wouldn’t be surprised to see deals like this one appear with other OEMs.

Thread beginning with comment 581773
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

Where has Samsung won some? They're at best, being generous a very good defensive player, in that they've been able to have some motions dismissed or some have been able to work around some infringements. Overall though a vast majority of their offensive patent attacks have been unsuccessful.

Reply Parent Score: 4

Thom_Holwerda Member since:

Samsung has not engaged in any offensive patent attacks. All their moves have been defensive against repeated attacks from software and design patent abuser Apple.

Reply Parent Score: 1

Nelson Member since:

I'm not sure where you got that idea from, but Samsung has initiated patent action in Germany for example.

Reply Parent Score: 4