Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Jan 2014 20:17 UTC

One more tidbit about Windows 8.1 Update 1 from my aforementioned source: Update 1 may feature some of the work that Microsoft has been doing behind the scenes to reduce further the memory and disk space requirements for Windows. This would allow Windows 8.1 Update 1 to run on cheaper small tablets.

Windows 8.1 Update 1, screen shots of which leaked earlier this week, is expected to allow users to pin Metro-style/Windows Store apps to their desktop task bars. Thumbnail previews of these Metro-style apps will be available from the Desktop task bar, according to additional screen shots. Windows 8.1 Update 1 also is expected to include close boxes for Metro-style apps.

Seems like some welcome changes, but it's going to take a lot more for people to warm up to Metro. The biggest problem to me is that since there aren't any compelling Metro applications, there's simply no reason to put with its idiosyncrasies, especially on desktops. I cannot think of a single Metro application that is better than its desktop counterpart, nor is there any Metro application that is better than similar applications on competing platforms.

Developers need users, and users need developers. Right now - Metro seems to lacks both.

Thread beginning with comment 581833
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Comment by Nelson
by nt_jerkface on Mon 27th Jan 2014 23:04 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by Nelson"
Member since:

Let's cut to the chase and see if you can answer a question that Sinofsky avoided:

Why does Microsoft get to directly port Office (a Win32 application) to Windows RT when existing .NET and Win32 developers are not allowed to do so?

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[8]: Comment by Nelson
by Nelson on Tue 28th Jan 2014 02:52 in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by Nelson"
Nelson Member since:

Because its Microsoft's OS? Really, that was your big question?

Reply Parent Score: 2