Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 24th Feb 2014 11:13 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless

Today, at Mobile World Congress, Nokia has unveiled its new line of smartphones: Nokia X. Instead of running Windows Phone or even Asha, these devices run Android, altered to look (somewhat) like Windows Phone. There's really not a whole lot of new stuff to say here, since most of it has already been leaked - except for the fact that there will be three Nokia X devices (with more to come!). The Nokia X, Nokia X+ (with slightly more memory), and the Nokia XL (with a larger display).

They look as colourful as any Nokia phone, but specifications are low-end; a dual-core 1Ghz processor, 800x480, and 512 or 768 MB RAM. It runs Android 4.1.2, and not the low-specifications optimised Android 4.4. It turns out that the low specifications impact the user experience, as evidenced by Tom Warren's first impressions:

Using the X can be quite frustrating, however, as the entire interface is prone to slow response and a lot of lag. Closing or switching between apps on the X takes far longer than other, even entry-level, smartphones, and browsing the web will quickly test your patience. The third-party apps we saw on the X, such as Facebook, looked as they do on other Android smartphones, but they too suffered from poor performance. Nokia's choice to combine the functions of home and back into the single back button is confusing, and i's difficult to predict exactly where in the interface the button will take you when you press it.

The user interface feels like Windows Phone, Android, and Harmattan had an illegitimate baby born out of wedlock. The end result is something that looks like a Frankenstein user interface, whose different aspects do not really align very well. The Metro-inspired homescreen, for instance, looks like a Windows Phone knock-off you would find on a cheap no-brand clone. The Android parts - inside applications, mostly - looks weird because Nokia's signature font simply doesn't fit.

I haven't used it, of course, so imagine a big asterisk here, but it looks like a classic example of design-by-committee. The Metro homescreen? Implemented because of Microsoft. The Nokia fonts? Implemented because Nokia. The swipe aspects? Because hey, the N9 is loved, so let's throw that in there as well. It doesn't feel like it has a unifying vision behind it.

The Nokia X looks like great hardware - as always, this is Nokia - but with a rather unusual and unappealing operating system. I honestly cannot wait until the XDA community gets its hands on this thing - I predict Google Play within a few days, and CyanogenMod within a few weeks. With this Android fork being completely void of Google services or Google applications, I would really wait until that's sorted out - unless you want to restrict yourself to a limited set of applications (developers need to port applications).

This raises the question of 'why'. Nokia now ships phones with four different operating systems - Windows Phone, Android, Series 40, Asha platform - which must be a hell to maintain. It doesn't really seem like Nokia needed to make an Android phone, considering that it already sells the 520 with Windows Phone. The only reason I can think of is that Nokia plans to eventually supplant Nokia Asha platform with this Android fork.

However, there's a problem here, and that's Microsoft's reaction to the Nokia X. Microsoft's Joe Belfiore:

We have a great relationship with Nokia. They've built great products. We haven't complete our acquisition. They may do some things we're excited about. Other things we are LESS excited. But whatever they do we are very supportive of the partnership.

That doesn't exactly instill confidence in the future of the Nokia X product line.

All in all, despite the somewhat shoddy first impressions of the user interface, and the warnings of slow performance, I'm still quite excited about the Nokia X. They look great, and once the XDA community gets its hands on it, it will actually become useful - because I saved the best for last: price. It'll be EUR 89 for the Nokia X, EUR 99 for the Nokia X+, and EUR 109 for the Nokia XL. To be honest, I think the X+ is the best deal, since the low resolution's pixelated edges of the 5" XL will most likely cut your eyeballs. Important note: it won't be available in the US.

That's a great price, and once CyanogenMod and other ROMs (4.4 instead of 4.1.2) run on it, it'll be useful too.

Thread beginning with comment 583461
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Are they nuts??
by bassbeast on Mon 24th Feb 2014 12:26 UTC
bassbeast
Member since:
2007-11-11

But WTH were they thinking pairing a DUAL CORE with a pathetic 512Mb of RAM? Really? That is like taking a turbo Porsche engine and jamming on a Pinto powertrain, all you have done is made something that is just gonna spend its time grinding. Its senseless, its stupid, and that single design choice has doomed it to running like crap. Hell my phone from 2011 has 512Mb of RAM...and the much lower resource 2.3! WTH Nokia?

Reply Score: 4

RE: Are they nuts??
by osvil on Mon 24th Feb 2014 12:45 in reply to "Are they nuts??"
osvil Member since:
2012-10-25

512 Mb and dual core? Like the iPhone 4S?

I agree they are nuts. Not because of only 512Mb for a dual core, but because it is 512Mb running Android, which is mostly a garbage collected platform:

http://people.cs.umass.edu/~emery/pubs/gcvsmalloc.pdf

From the article conclusions:
[...]
"Comparing runtime, space consumption, and virtual memory footprints over a range of benchmarks, we show that the runtime performance of the best-performing garbage collector is competitive with explicit memory management when given enough memory."
[...]
"garbage collection’s performance degrades substantially when it must use smaller heaps. With three times as much memory, it runs 17% slower on average, and with twice as much memory, it runs 70% slower."
[...]

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[2]: Are they nuts??
by tylerdurden on Mon 24th Feb 2014 20:53 in reply to "RE: Are they nuts??"
tylerdurden Member since:
2009-03-17

I assume this phone is just a repurposed low end lumia HW platform running android instead of WP.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Are they nuts??
by some1 on Tue 25th Feb 2014 04:13 in reply to "RE: Are they nuts??"
some1 Member since:
2010-10-05

All current top mobile OSes use automatic memory management in their default application frameworks. And most other mobile OSes too, with the exception of Megoo and Ubuntu, and maybe something even more obscure.
Also, 512Mb used to be a ton of memory. Certainly enough to run a GC. People ran gcs on systems with 4 killowords (of course, the design of those gcs was quite different).

Edited 2014-02-25 04:14 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3