Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 24th Feb 2014 11:13 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless

Today, at Mobile World Congress, Nokia has unveiled its new line of smartphones: Nokia X. Instead of running Windows Phone or even Asha, these devices run Android, altered to look (somewhat) like Windows Phone. There's really not a whole lot of new stuff to say here, since most of it has already been leaked - except for the fact that there will be three Nokia X devices (with more to come!). The Nokia X, Nokia X+ (with slightly more memory), and the Nokia XL (with a larger display).

They look as colourful as any Nokia phone, but specifications are low-end; a dual-core 1Ghz processor, 800x480, and 512 or 768 MB RAM. It runs Android 4.1.2, and not the low-specifications optimised Android 4.4. It turns out that the low specifications impact the user experience, as evidenced by Tom Warren's first impressions:

Using the X can be quite frustrating, however, as the entire interface is prone to slow response and a lot of lag. Closing or switching between apps on the X takes far longer than other, even entry-level, smartphones, and browsing the web will quickly test your patience. The third-party apps we saw on the X, such as Facebook, looked as they do on other Android smartphones, but they too suffered from poor performance. Nokia's choice to combine the functions of home and back into the single back button is confusing, and i's difficult to predict exactly where in the interface the button will take you when you press it.

The user interface feels like Windows Phone, Android, and Harmattan had an illegitimate baby born out of wedlock. The end result is something that looks like a Frankenstein user interface, whose different aspects do not really align very well. The Metro-inspired homescreen, for instance, looks like a Windows Phone knock-off you would find on a cheap no-brand clone. The Android parts - inside applications, mostly - looks weird because Nokia's signature font simply doesn't fit.

I haven't used it, of course, so imagine a big asterisk here, but it looks like a classic example of design-by-committee. The Metro homescreen? Implemented because of Microsoft. The Nokia fonts? Implemented because Nokia. The swipe aspects? Because hey, the N9 is loved, so let's throw that in there as well. It doesn't feel like it has a unifying vision behind it.

The Nokia X looks like great hardware - as always, this is Nokia - but with a rather unusual and unappealing operating system. I honestly cannot wait until the XDA community gets its hands on this thing - I predict Google Play within a few days, and CyanogenMod within a few weeks. With this Android fork being completely void of Google services or Google applications, I would really wait until that's sorted out - unless you want to restrict yourself to a limited set of applications (developers need to port applications).

This raises the question of 'why'. Nokia now ships phones with four different operating systems - Windows Phone, Android, Series 40, Asha platform - which must be a hell to maintain. It doesn't really seem like Nokia needed to make an Android phone, considering that it already sells the 520 with Windows Phone. The only reason I can think of is that Nokia plans to eventually supplant Nokia Asha platform with this Android fork.

However, there's a problem here, and that's Microsoft's reaction to the Nokia X. Microsoft's Joe Belfiore:

We have a great relationship with Nokia. They've built great products. We haven't complete our acquisition. They may do some things we're excited about. Other things we are LESS excited. But whatever they do we are very supportive of the partnership.

That doesn't exactly instill confidence in the future of the Nokia X product line.

All in all, despite the somewhat shoddy first impressions of the user interface, and the warnings of slow performance, I'm still quite excited about the Nokia X. They look great, and once the XDA community gets its hands on it, it will actually become useful - because I saved the best for last: price. It'll be EUR 89 for the Nokia X, EUR 99 for the Nokia X+, and EUR 109 for the Nokia XL. To be honest, I think the X+ is the best deal, since the low resolution's pixelated edges of the 5" XL will most likely cut your eyeballs. Important note: it won't be available in the US.

That's a great price, and once CyanogenMod and other ROMs (4.4 instead of 4.1.2) run on it, it'll be useful too.

Thread beginning with comment 583466
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Bet won!
by Adurbe on Mon 24th Feb 2014 13:40 UTC in reply to "RE: Bet won!"
Member since:

haha double or nothing! Done ;)


I think they will release them, but I doubt in the 'west', it will be delayed until its obsolete.

This phone is (to my mind) aimed squarely at the Indian sub-continent. They have the brand there and this is their last chance to capitalise on it before they 'lose' their hardware.

Nokia will really really push this range as I think Nokia will continue with their own app store/fork well after MS kill the Nokia X itself.

Nokia is in a unique position.
They have a 10 year cross licensing agreement with MS as part of the buy-out. This could mean their OEMs not having to pay the 'android tax'. $10 dollars per phone will soon add up for the mass production OEMs.

Microsoft would certainly support this endeavour, as it takes share from Google, the 'real enemy'. Maybe a Nokia store exclusive android MS Office to help the push ;)

p.s. I'm not breaking each of those down into bets :-p

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[3]: Bet won!
by avgalen on Mon 24th Feb 2014 16:23 in reply to "RE[2]: Bet won!"
avgalen Member since:

From what I understood you seem to think that after Microsoft buys Nokia, Nokia will continue to make smartphones like these X-smartphones. As far as I understood they neither have the right to do that (no smartphones or featurephones for a few years), nor the capability (departments move to Microsoft), nor the branding (Lumia and Asha become MS-only for a few years), nor even the desire (HERE maps, patents and cellular infrastructure are all Nokia will focus on for a few years).

From what I have read Nokia is going to release it on the 3rd of March. This really seems a total rush job after developing it for so long. I think they just want to get it out into the world before Microsoft takes over and kills it.
Basically these are AOSP (4.1.2 WTF) phones that have nothing to do with Google services (GSM) but run Nokia and Microsoft services instead. They might look (but don't behave) like Windows Phone...but they run Android apps instead of Windows Phone apps so they are in no way a "gateway-drug" into Windows Phone.

Of course we will never see any of these phones, just like we normally don't see any Asha-phones and I don't think we are missing anything because of that.

This whole thing still has me stumped. It is as if Nokia is making a final statement about "what could have been" and Microsoft has no choice but to let it happen

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[4]: Bet won!
by Adurbe on Mon 24th Feb 2014 17:07 in reply to "RE[3]: Bet won!"
Adurbe Member since:

Nokia cant sell phones, but (as far as I'm aware) there is nothing stopping them running a store and android fork which in turn they can offer to OEMs.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Bet won!
by zima on Fri 28th Feb 2014 12:09 in reply to "RE[3]: Bet won!"
zima Member since:

Google services (GSM)

GSM, confusing name when it comes to mobiles...

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Bet won!
by glarepate on Tue 25th Feb 2014 17:16 in reply to "RE[2]: Bet won!"
glarepate Member since:

You are right on the money here.

The new X phones will not be offered in the West. At least in the U.S.

And Indian manufacturers Xola and Karbonn have been announced along with Chinese electronics maker Hon Hai, which trades under the name, wait for it,


Reply Parent Score: 3