Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 26th Mar 2014 14:58 UTC

Notch was working with the Oculus team to bring Minecraft to the Rift - and then the Facebook news hit. He immediately cancelled the project.

I definitely want to be a part of VR, but I will not work with Facebook. Their motives are too unclear and shifting, and they haven’t historically been a stable platform. There’s nothing about their history that makes me trust them, and that makes them seem creepy to me.

And I did not chip in ten grand to seed a first investment round to build value for a Facebook acquisition.

It seems like Notch sums up the general response to Facebook acquiring Oculus pretty well.

Thread beginning with comment 585419
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Perspective
by minifig404 on Wed 26th Mar 2014 22:41 UTC in reply to "RE: Perspective"
Member since:

I don't think "Notch sums up the general response to Facebook acquiring Oculus pretty well" (nor do I think Thom can back that up). It seems to me the general sense is "huh?" most often with a dash of wait-and-see.

Would that the Ars Technica comments matched your pattern. Lots of unrest over there.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Perspective
by jockm on Thu 27th Mar 2014 15:34 in reply to "RE[2]: Perspective"
jockm Member since:

Because Ars and Notch represent a consensus? Can you back that up. I have been talking to game developers I know, and listening to a broad set of opinions from a lot of sources and I personally am seeing far more wait and see (or positive) comments than I am seeing negative.

That is the problem with arguing though anecdote, there are always counter anecdote. Give it a couple of months and we will see actual data of how devs are responding.

Reply Parent Score: 2