Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 7th Apr 2014 19:55 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y

I'm using the URL slug headline for this one (check the link).

This map showing the locations of 280 million individual posts on Twitter shows a depressing divide in America: Tweets coming from Manhattan tend to come from iPhones. Tweets coming from Newark, N.J., tend to come from Android phones.

If you live in the New York metro area, you don't need to be told that Manhattan is where the region's rich people live, and the poor live in Newark. Manhattan's median income is $67,000 a year. Newark's is $17,000, according to U.S. Census data.

This fascinates me, as it seems to be a very American thing. In The Netherlands, Android has an 80% market share, and we have far lower poverty rates than the US (that Newark median income is crazy low by Dutch standards). I'm pretty sure the situation is similar for many other West-European nations.

This raises an interesting question: is it 'Android is for poor people' - or is it 'Android is for poor people in America'?

Thread beginning with comment 586585
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
kwan_e
Member since:
2007-02-18

If you're in America and you're over the age of 30, then it probably is. There are entire college curriculums online for people to consume; with Android tablets being as cheap as $50 and free wifi hotspots all over town, you might be poor, but you don't have to stay that way. That might not be enough to get you a 6 figure salary, but it should be enough to get you above the poverty level, where you can start taking some real classes.


Because all poor people are single 30 white males with no children.

Reply Parent Score: 5

WorknMan Member since:
2005-11-13

Because all poor people are single 30 white males with no children.


And if you had kids while living below the poverty level, who's fault is that?

Reply Parent Score: 2

kwan_e Member since:
2007-02-18

"Because all poor people are single 30 white males with no children.


And if you had kids while living below the poverty level, who's fault is that?
"

Because every person who has kids while in poverty had those kids during poverty. They could NEVER have had kids when they could afford it, then slipped into a state of poverty because of external factors.

Because everything in the world happens according to a strict predictable order and any deviation from that is 100% the fault of the "victim".

Bad local economies NEVER happen, and EVERYONE should automatically be able to find a job because America.

Reply Parent Score: 8