Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Apr 2014 22:42 UTC
Mozilla & Gecko clones

Fortunately though, Mozilla keeps on trucking, and Firefox OS appears to be constantly improving. The latest version available is 1.3.0, with the latest preview being 1.4. Now, sources from China have gotten their hands on a ton of screenshots and new information regarding Firefox OS 2.0, and we must say, the UI looks quite pretty.

This looks quite good indeed.

Thread beginning with comment 586793
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: ...
by themwagency on Wed 9th Apr 2014 23:26 UTC in reply to "..."
themwagency
Member since:
2013-03-06

I don't trust Mozilla, actually I uninstalled Firefox (as thousands more)


As did I. I won't support any company that capitulates the way they did simply because the CEO exercised his personal free speech.

if they bow down to the "gay mafia" how can I trust they won't bow to the government?


It doesn't even have to be for that. They capitulated because he exercised free speech. That is bad enough. I will never have this company's browser or any other related product they produce installed on any computer I own ever again.

If they can't respect the privacy of their own CEO how can I trust them mine? Mozilla blew it big time, they lost more than just a CEO.


Amen brother!

Edited 2014-04-09 23:28 UTC

Reply Parent Score: -3

RE[2]: ...
by ddc_ on Wed 9th Apr 2014 23:42 in reply to "RE: ..."
ddc_ Member since:
2006-12-05

"I don't trust Mozilla, actually I uninstalled Firefox (as thousands more)


As did I. I won't support any company that capitulates the way they did simply because the CEO exercised his personal free speech.
"
I never actually liked Firefox, but this kind of comments make me want it installed. It is amazing that after all those years of social development people still call "free speech" one's attempts at controling others' bedrooms.

Reply Parent Score: 10

RE[3]: ...
by themwagency on Wed 9th Apr 2014 23:49 in reply to "RE[2]: ..."
themwagency Member since:
2013-03-06

>"It is amazing that after all those years of social development people still call "free speech" one's attempts at controling others' bedrooms."

...or redefining the definition of marriage.

For the record, nobody was saying gays couldn't do what gays do in the bedroom.... or even have the same legal rights as married people. Marriage is a religious institution. It's redefinition is especially concerning to those of religious background. It was not about "hate" as was often implied or outright stated. It was simply an issue of definitions. Words mean things. When a group tries to change them there are ramifications for that change.

if the problem is about government's recognition of marriage then let the government stop doing so. The whole reason why the government played any involvement in the first place was to reinforce the family unit as this helps society. That is a moot point if the redefinition of marriage includes those you can't create a family naturally.

I don't want to get off track so I'm hoping you will let this side-thread about gay rights relative to christian rights end with this comment.

Edited 2014-04-09 23:57 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 0