Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Apr 2014 22:42 UTC
Mozilla & Gecko clones

Fortunately though, Mozilla keeps on trucking, and Firefox OS appears to be constantly improving. The latest version available is 1.3.0, with the latest preview being 1.4. Now, sources from China have gotten their hands on a ton of screenshots and new information regarding Firefox OS 2.0, and we must say, the UI looks quite pretty.

This looks quite good indeed.

Thread beginning with comment 586819
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: ...
by WereCatf on Thu 10th Apr 2014 04:14 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: ..."
WereCatf
Member since:
2006-02-15

It was called "Domestic Partnership". It had very nearly (although not _exactly_)


As I look at it, it's not recognized by the federal law. That means it's not even nearly equal.

but saying things like "the term doesn't matter" is completely missing the point - the controversy is entirely about the term. Pro or against, whatever, that is EXACTLY what it is about. It is not a rights issue, it is about the term "marriage".


Well, I suppose we hang out in different kinds of groups. The people I associate with don't care about the term being used and neither do I.

but my preference would be to completely divorce the concept of religious marriage with legal marriage.


That would be the most sane thing to do. Religion should have no play whatsoever wrt. politics and law.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[7]: ...
by galvanash on Thu 10th Apr 2014 04:29 in reply to "RE[6]: ..."
galvanash Member since:
2006-01-25

"It was called "Domestic Partnership". It had very nearly (although not _exactly_)


As I look at it, it's not recognized by the federal law. That means it's not even nearly equal.
"

You have to keep the timeline in mind... Prior to June 2013 it din't matter what you called it - the US federal government did not recognize same-sex marriages - period. As such, at the time, Domestic Partnership was equivalent to marriage in the state of California.

I'm not trying to condone Prop 8, fact is those who pushed for that ballot initiative tried a few others first that were extremely anti-gay rights - they didn't make the ballot fortunately... But regardless, Prop 8 was not an anti-gar rights bill - it was purely about designation, i.e. it was about use of the word marriage. That is just fact.

Edited 2014-04-10 04:29 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[8]: ...
by WereCatf on Thu 10th Apr 2014 04:37 in reply to "RE[7]: ..."
WereCatf Member since:
2006-02-15

You have to keep the timeline in mind... Prior to June 2013 it din't matter what you called it - the US federal government did not recognize same-sex marriages - period. As such, at the time, Domestic Partnership was equivalent to marriage in the state of California.


I don't see how any of that is relevant to what I said. Regardless of the term being used the situation just isn't equal in the whole country, no matter how much California does or doesn't do about it. If they had used "marriage" as the term it still would be the same situation. The term just doesn't matter, it's merely a word, and there's no reason for why "marriage" couldn't be in use by religious institutes and some other term by federal government.

Reply Parent Score: 3